Tuesday, August 24, 2010

More Random Barking


Armed Against A Future Filled With Teabags, Religious Crazies,
Internet And Water Rationing, And Poor Cell Phone Coverage

Both of my parents came of age during the Depression -- my father was fifteen, and my mother fourteen, when the 1929 Crash occurred, and had graduated from High School by the time Franklin D. Roosevelt was inaugurated as President in March of 1932.

(If, at this point, you're trying to figure out how old I am -- and you probably aren't -- I was an unplanned, late puppy; very late.)

Both came from small towns, their families barely part of the American Middle Class, whose own parents managed to hang on to jobs and property long enough to send them out into a country and a world marked by twelve years of economic misery -- which only World War Two truly ended.

Storm tides recede, leaving all kinds of things behind -- some interesting, some comic, some destructive. All her life, my mother was obsessed in a minor-key way with stretching every dime, every piece of clothing, saving string and pencils, tinfoil and rubber bands for reuse. Like something out of a Leonard Cohen novel, we had an old, pitted pair of scissors in the far-right hand drawer of the kitchen, always referred to as "the new pair".

My father, whose two older brothers (the ones who emigrated with the rest of the family to America in 1920; the oldest brother stayed behind) had worked in a 'Gentleman's Clothiers', was concerned with dress and deportment; he believed appearances were everything: Clothes, manner, speech -- all of which were to provide you with a competitive edge in life, which was ultimately a brutal and disappointing contest.

Both of them in memory, now, strike me as living with a lump of fatalism at the core of themselves; a child's disappointment with the world not being a more gentle, fair and safe place. In no way were they failures at the basics of living -- but their response to life's experiences wasn't to create light in the darkness, to spit in the eye of the unknown and dance anyway. They carried on; that was all.

They were afraid of tragedy and loss, and while they put as brave a face on the day as possible, in the end they expected rejection, failure, a diminution. Their hopes lived side by side with expectations of the world that weren't particularly high. Catastrophe could occur at any moment, and nothing was certain or stable enough to be counted upon; the tide of fear won out over hope and faith every time.


Obligatory Cute Small Animal Photo In Middle Of Random Barking
(Photo [Who Could Have Predicted?]: The Great Curmudgeon)

It was clear they'd been marked by their times. I began to wonder -- that I'm aware of, no study has been published of the effects of so much stress upon a population as in the years between 1929 and 1942.

I'm not sure how you'd quantify it, but there had to have been a rise in all kinds of disorders that we now label Clinical Depression, Obsessive-Compulsive behaviors, psychosomatic illness. However, psychiatry was still a young science; perspectives on suffering and the mind (such as Post-Traumatic Stress) which we take for granted today would have found no support among medical professionals in the Thirties.

And, the effects of the Depression (even for people who didn't suffer the worst of it) was profound enough that artifacts of the stress of those times remained in the lives of most people, like flotsam left beached after a storm. They were things out of place; not serious enough neuroses to keep most people from functioning well enough to raise families, or hold jobs and conduct business.

But, I'd argue that as if they carried a physical scar, people had a mark on their psyches which affected them as long as they lived -- and for those who lived through the Depression and saw combat service in WWII, it was probably worse.

Now? Power being handed to juvenile sociopaths; a horrible terrorist attack, followed by equally-horrible ten-year war(s); the destruction of a major American city in Katrina; a decade of failure to regulate the financial services industry leading to unparalleled manipulation and greed; it ends with wealth and power protected, and everyone else kicked to the curb.

How many families and individuals have been blown apart so far? How many careers lost, addicts created, criminal acts committed; how many homeless children will there be this time? How much human misery will be heaped on our collective psyches -- because The Masters Of The Universe had to dominate everything they could see, and have More?

What's happening to us, to our children, as a result of these days? What kind of hidden marks will they carry? And what will their children passively accept as a sad inheritance out of bad times?

But, I'm only a Dog, and no one listens to me.


Monday, August 23, 2010

Tiger Woods Divorced

Respondent Admits And Agrees That Paragraphs 1-10 Of Petitioner's Complaint Are True And Correct

And I absolutely, completely, don't care.

What happens to people in Pakistan, or in Haiti, I do care about.

If all success teaches you is, being the best at something automatically grants you permission to act upon whatever desires pop into your tiny mind, no matter what the repercussions are for other people... then your life will be (as Tom Leher tells us) very much like a sewer: What you get out of it depends on what you put into it.

Stay Classy, Woody.


Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Red Land

Dinner With Bill, Sean, Mikey, Glenn, And Zeppo

A very mildly liberal christian friend, who had spent most of her formative years in Texas, just returned to California after a visit there, feeling bewildered and a little frightened.

At a restaurant dinner with the family of a close childhood friend, people around the table began questioning her about living in "that California": Wasn't there a lot of crime? Wasn't all that gay marriage stuff just terrible? So against god? What about "your illegals"; didn't she think we should do something about that?

Most of the people around the table had known my friend for at least a decade as she grew up in Texas and went to college. They lived in the same neighborhood. Their daughter and my friend have remained close over the twenty-plus years since; my friend is not a stranger to these people, and they're aware she's a christian.

My friend has also been unemployed for more than a year, raising three teenagers as a single parent, slowly spending her savings. She had nervously spent money to travel with her eldest son to see him ready to attend college this Fall (which he could do only because he had received a scholarship). Everyone at the table knew all of this, too.

She was a little nonplussed by their questions about California, and tried to answer noncommittally -- but it seemed that asking her these questions was just the family's way of introducing topics to monologue over:

>> Obama is "turning the country socialist", and "wants to build
that mosque"; "Somebody should do something."

>> Obama "is Muslim";

>> Many people on long-term unemployment are "lazy", and
any extensions of benefits are just "coddling" them;

>> One of the women around the table told my friend Europe
will be overrun
by hordes of Islamists while the rest of the world
stands by, paralyzed by liberal softness: The woman had been
reading America Alone: The End Of The World As We Know It,
a book by Rightist author Mark Steyn published in 2006. (Little
Rupert's Fox hearts Steyn and his book.). In all seriousness, the
woman told my friend, "He [Steyn] is the finest writer I've ever read";

My friend (who had married a man from Jakarta, Indonesia, and
worked abroad) asked the people around the table if they had
traveled in Europe; the father in the family replied, "I've
never been outside the United States", almost with pride;

>> The threat of illegal immigrants is very real -- "They
think Texas and the Southwest is still their land, and they'll try
taking it back if we don't do something," a man said.

My friend had sat uncomfortably at the table, and said little in response. Finally, the grandmother in the family stood up, looked archly at my friend and said (as if it were a rebuke), "Yesterday I went to my first Tea Party meeting" -- then abruptly walked out of the room.

My friend has a number of health issues, and takes several medications (currently paid for through an expensive COBRA plan, which she will lose as it's too expensive), and one side effect is a decreased appetite. The father in the family paid for everyone's meal; when handing the bill and a credit card to the waiter, he turned to my friend and said, "S'that why you didn't order any food? 'cause you don't have any money?" And, he was in no way kind when he said it.

What dismayed and frightened my friend was how angry her friend's family seemed. "I'm not all that liberal, but the more they talked, the angrier they got -- I was from California, so to them I had to be some kind of hippie radical.

"What was really frightening was their ignorance," my friend told me. "They weren't thinking for themselves; they didn't want to listen to anything except the kind of right-wing radio junk they were regurgitating."

Remember: Most of the family around the table had known my friend for at least a decade as she grew up and went to college. Their daughter and my friend have remained close in the twenty-plus years since; my friend is not a stranger -- but these people went out of their way to demean and insult her over perceived and assumed matters of ideology.

They thought she was a "California liberal", and treated her according to their own code of conduct. My friend, committed to her faith, did not protest. That would not have been my choice of response.

As she recounted what she'd heard said around the table in a public restaurant, my friend also remembered these people kept repeating phrases like, if we don't do something... somebody needs to do something... we'd better do something.

I have a very, very bad feeling about the future.

(NOTE: This post was edited on August 20, 8:07AM PDST)


Jobs Is On The Way!

London's Financial Times reports that "call center workers are becoming as cheap to hire in the US as they are in India, according to the head of the country’s largest business process outsourcing company."

As a Dog, I have a fair nose for things. Back in February, I added yet another extended rant a post about circumstances in the American economy:

Keep your eyes on the Fed Rate, and the CPI. If the first stays flat and the other continues to drop... well, hopefully other countries will outsource their call center and manufacturing work to the U.S., where there could be a huge pool of cheap labor in the not-too distant future.



Man; I hate to be right about some things. However, that's also vexing -- what happens if other stuff I've considered becomes real, too?


...Like A European Communist Uprising?


...Or Little Rupert's Dream Come True: Hitler Gets His Own Slot?

Well, we live in America: Land Of The Free, Home Of The Hip, where anything is possible. Don't we?


Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Get Happi Again



C'mon, America: Learn The Secret Known To The Ancients. Or, not.


Random Barking

The New York Times online reported that a suicide bomber in Baghdad killed forty or more today.

Over the past few weeks in my neighborhood, I've noticed uncollected garbage, discarded clothing and furniture, sitting on sidewalks -- and I live in a relatively affluent area on Nob Hill (not in the actual Rich Person's part of it, though).

And watching people act towards each other in public situations, there seems to be a harder edge, a what do you want; get the hell outta my way attitude; a presumption that the world sucks and will continue to suck even more as time progresses.

There's a lot of anger, even hatred, out there, looking for somewhere to flow. The Big Boys and Girls on the Right would like to channel that -- into votes, into advertising and commercial profit, into larger attendance in Megachurches.

They've already tried it, in the Teabaggers -- but they're not reading the poll numbers: People believe politicians suck; that the Dems suck -- but Repubs suck even more.

As The Great Curmudgeon noted, anything different is difficult for anyone to remember, now.

However, I keep thinking that it didn't have to have turned out this way. Or, perhaps (given what humans are), there really was no other outcome.


Sunday, August 15, 2010

Anchored

"First and foremost, I’m a businessman. My first goal is to attract the largest audience possible so I can charge confiscatory ad rates. I happen to have great entertainment skills, but that enables me to sell airtime.” Then he added -- as if he had to after a rare moment of honesty -- "But in my heart and soul, I know I have become the intellectual engine of the conservative movement."
John McManus, "The Flap Over Limbaugh", New American, April 2009


(Photo: Courtesy Knowledge Rush.com -- No Joke)

Lard Boy, 63, racist homophobic misogynistic junkie and self-described shill "intellectual engine" for America's Rightist movement, was reeled in and moored over the weekend to wed 33-year-old Kathryn Rogers in a 'Hawaiian Themed' celebration at a Miami Beach hotel.

This the Blimp's fourth time into the Swine Unit mating chute, and the first for Ms. Rogers.

Guests at the wedding included Karl Rove, Rudy Giuliani, Lard Boy's personal anesthesiologist, and the reanimated corpse of Dean Acheson, who caused a moment of dismay when, as he stood up during the ceremony, his lower jaw fell off.


Lard Boy Salutes The Crowd With Bride And Undead Acheson

When the classic question was raised, If anyone here present knows of any reason why these two may not be joined in holy matrimony, the nose of Rove and a number of other conservatives who sat quietly grew in length by approximately 200 per cent.


Embraced By The Horror: The Couple At A Celebration Of Scotch

The most-remarked part of the celebration in the media was the evening's premiere entertainer, Sir Elton John.

After years of applauding Lard Boy's gay-bashing on-air -- just as they applaud his racist remarks and incitements to defy the government bordering on sedition, even revealing anti-semitism -- many conservatives and evangelicals were "dismayed" that Sir Elton's appearance at the wedding seemed hypocritical.


A Color Guard At The Wedding: Official Photo

However, Zav Chafets, the official biographer of the Michelin Man, hurried to defend his meal ticket remind us that not many people knew it, but Slobodan Milosevic was a deeply sentimental man; and that in his heart, Nikolai Chaucescu really loved dogs and children. A whole a lot.



In an interview last summer [Limbaugh] told me that he regards homosexuality as most likely determined by biology, considers other people’s sex lives to be none of his business and supports gay civil unions. I’m pretty sure that Elton John’s sexual orientation never even crossed Limbaugh’s mind.

I'm sure these samples of the Blimp's comments are proof of his deeply-held personal beliefs.

The new couple have made pleas for privacy. "We try to live our lives as normal people," Lard Boy said in a message on his website. We do not seek media attention. We do not want it, especially for this."


This government is governing against its own citizens.
This president and his party are governing against us.
We are at war with our own President, we are at war with
our own government.

Voice Of The Blimp, January 9, 2010

The media is, aber natürlich, all a-gog and a-twitter. The New York Daily News (competitor to Little Rupert's New York Post) reported "Rush Limbaugh marries gal pal Kathryn Rogers"; USA Today, always insightful, asks "But Will She Love His Cars Too?"

And, everyone, just everyone, wanted to see photos of the event. The Blimp allowed a controlled release, each with his tasteful trademark "Excellence In Broadcasting" stamp.


Excellence In Broadcasting Man Will Save Us From The Scary Awful
Evil Illegitimate Negro Leader, For Ten Gallons Of Fudge Ripple

Psychology Today also weighed in on the event:

Rush Limbaugh's multiple marriages is a 21st century American story... we Americans are crazy about both pair bonding and breaking up...

In his public comments about his marriages, Limbaugh seems to fall right into this conventional pattern of explanation for marital failure... Real insight into a divorce involves understanding one’s own role. Limbaugh at one time did show potentially deeper insight into why he was not good love material.

“I’m too much in love with myself,” he said once between marriages. I wonder if his new wife saw that quote, or this one: "If you want a successful marriage, let your husband do what he wants to do," he once said.

What seared me at the end of a troubling week is the public story line that it’s wonderful to keep trying to find a lifelong mate despite any evidence that the newlyweds have learned squat from past divorces.


Unless she's a brainless, Inflate-o Love Doll with no sense of self, taste, or personal hygiene, I sentence the happy couple to no less than two, and an absolute maximum of four, years.

Take a look at Rogers' body language in photographs of Limbaugh and herself; you could read her body tension as discomfort with the unfamiliarity of being a 'public person' and the focus of photographers. But when in that situation, the tendency would be to relax or lean closer to someone loved and yearned for; where you would feel safe. And -- sorry to harsh your extreme buzz, Rush -- I don't see that in Rogers' posture. Quite the opposite.


Blimp's End: 'Tucked In With A Spade' ; Or, A Large Crane

All I look forward to is seeing the Zeppelin's obituary in Little Rupert's papers ("Giant Of The Age Passes - And The World Mourns"). And (depending upon the language in the inevitable pre-nuptial she will have to sign), in my opinion, Rogers may be keeping that day in mind as she, uh, 'experiences' the connubial embrace of The Blimp. Over and over and over.

But, who cares? I'm much more interested in this.


Friday, August 13, 2010

'Her First Name Could Be Doctor'




Congenital Racist Dr. Laura (Photo: Ugly Neck Monthly)

Mary Elizabeth Williams reports from Salon that this past Tuesday, the Right-wing radio host, Dr. Laura Schlessinger, ripped off the rubber mask of tolerance and revealed her true ugly, reptilian face.

Kind of like that moment in the original "V" series, when the aliens' masks got ripped and showed their dark green, scaly hides and vertical-slit eyes -- except in this case, Dr. Laura's ripped mask revealed she was wearing (gasp!) a Ku Klux Klan Hood!

... the controversial radio host/crackpot [Williams reported] fielded a call on her program from an African-American woman who said she was weary of her white husband's family and friends' racist comments. ...The caller... explained that her husband's comrades ask her questions like "How do you black people like doing this? Do black people really like doing that?" -- which Schlessinger promptly dismissed as "not racist... A lot of blacks voted for Obama simply 'cause he was half-black," Dr. Laura continued. "Didn't matter what he was going to do in office. It was a black thing."

Ruh-Roh. If I'd been Laura's on-air publicist, I would have been making the "kill" sign -- drawing an index finger across my throat -- to get her to not go there. However, that's a message never given to coddled and pampered Rethug media stars, most of whom can't seem to keep their inner Strom Thurmond in check (Imagine trying to tell Lard Boy not to make a racist comment!).

Anyway; filled with the righteousness and moral rectitude she so often preaches from her little radio pulpit, Laura charged ahead: Look -- it's Stalingrad! We can take one city; how much trouble could it be?


Obligatory Cute Small Animal Photo In Middle Of Blog Rant

The caller then pressed on, asking: "What about the N-word? The N-word's been thrown around" [i.e., by friends of her husbands']. To which Dr. Laura airily retorted: "Black guys use it all the time. Turn on HBO, listen to a buh-lack comic, and all you hear is nigger nigger nigger. I don't get it. If anybody without enough melanin says it, it's a horrible thing. But when black people say it, it's affectionate."

The caller, clearly agitated by now, nevertheless remained respectful, asking, "Is it ever OK to say that word?" Schlessinger responded by accusing her of having a "chip on [her] shoulder," telling her, "Don't NAACP me", and that
[the caller] possessed "a lot of what I hear from blackthink." For the kicker, she added, "If you're that hypersensitive about color and don't have a sense of humor, don't marry out of your race."

Predictably, a large number of people said Laura was a silly bint and offensive in the extreme. On Wednesday, she issued an apology on her website.



Though she said, "I did the wrong thing," adding that she was so upset about the incident she had to cut her show short, she also continued to display her trademark cluelessness. "I was attempting to make a philosophical point," she explained, adding that "I ended up, I’m sure, with many of you losing the point I was trying to make, because you were shocked by the fact that I said the word."

Sure; absolutely, that's why people were disgusted.

For the clueless, like Frau Schlessinger, use of the n-term between blacks is a recognition of solidarity around past slavery and present second-class-citizenhood in the eyes and minds of people like herself. It's an "Our Thing", infra dig reference, and not to be used by outsiders. Period.

Guess you can't use HBO as your guide when it comes to determining the reality of racial sensitivity and common humanity -- eh, Laura?


Thursday, August 12, 2010

Fifty Miles Of Bad Road



For several years I've been expecting that we would wake up one morning to discover Iran had been hit by a series of air strikes to reduce or destroy its capability to manufacture weapons-grade, enriched Uranium. I still do.

Despite that possibility, and in the face of UN economic sanctions, the fundamentalist Islamic clerics and corrupt Republican Guards commanders running that country have pushed ahead in developing that capability. At the same time, they claim to want to negotiate with the UN, then rebuff them over and over; oddly, very much like the North Koreans treated the UN and the United States in the run-up to developing their very own Bomb.

The Iranians have also counted on the fact that a) Any attack would further unite the Islamic world against Israel and the West, when America needs the support of moderate Arabic states, needs their oil, and needs to push Israel towards peace with the Palestinians; b) Attacks would (at least publicly) unite the Iranian people behind their government; and c) Draw international condemnation over radioactive contamination that would result from bombing nuclear facilities.

The Iranian rulers are clever, and resourceful, but they have to know none of that matters. To the Israelis, it's this simple: Iran (or any neighboring state of Israel's) cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. Period.

So; when? is the question. In the most recent issue of The Atlantic Monthly, Jeffrey Goldberg, their national correspondent, published an article which took months to research and write titled "The Point Of No Return".

(Note: Goldberg has been criticized by Glenn Greenwald at Salon ["Does the past record of journalists matter?" ], and "Wanker Of The Day" by The Great Curmudgeon, among others.)

(Their criticism is based in Goldberg's 2002 writings, which pushed lies about evil Saadam's WMD's in Iraq, used by Lil' Boots and President Cheney as justifications to invade that country.)

(These were in fact lies; and journalists [such as the NYT's Judith Miller] who sold them to the U.S. public were noting but shills for the Bush administration, which shat on the world for nine years. Goldberg was seen by Greenberg and The Curmudgeon as an enabler of lies and worse than lies about Iraq, and that he is writing something very similar about Iran now. Just so you know.)

As Steve Clemons in TPM notes, "after conducting dozens of interviews with senior members of Israel's national security establishment as well as many top personalities in the Obama White House, [Goldberg] concludes ...that the likelihood of Israel unilaterally bombing Iran to curtail a potential nuclear weapon breakout capacity is north of 50-50."

And, there's funny in the article, too: Goldberg recounts how Lil' Boots refused to listen when President Cheney wanted a joint bombing of Iran in concert with Israel. Bill Kristol and Charles Krauthammer pressed Lil' Boots to attack, and (with that propensity of the hereditary wealthy to bestow nicknames on pets, children, and retainers) Bush referred to them as "The Bomber Boys".

"In short [Steve Clemons relates], Goldberg paints a picture that despite the likelihood of very high cost blowback from Iran in the wake of a unilateral strike by Israel, or a coordinated attack with the US, there are numerous tilts toward bombing embedded in the current political orders in both Jerusalem and Washington."

Given that the Iranians have already lied and repeatedly tried to hide aspects of their Uranium-enrichment program from UN inspectors; and that their President, Little Mahmood, seems to speak for Iran's Islamic leadership when he claims the Holocaust never happened and that Israel should cease to exist; and that Israel's current government is captained by Benjamin Netanyahu, who is the hard-line head of the Likud Party...

I'm hoping that something else will happen. I'd like Iran's leaders to see reason; but they haven't so far, and I don't believe they will. I'd like the Israeli government to be judicious, but they weren't in Gaza and this is a much more threatening situation from their perspective. What other outcome is possible?

When maps were being made in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth centuries, cartographers used an inscription on occasion to signify blank areas on a map where things were unknown: Here There Be Dragons, or Here There Be Tygers... and everyone understood, 'If you venture here, no one knows what will happen'.

And in Vietnam, signs would be erected at the start of an area where hostile fire was expected: Fifty Miles Of Bad Road Ahead.

UPDATE: On Friday, August 13th, the New York Times online reported that the Russian government announced its state nuclear power company would take a crucial step this month to start Iran’s first nuclear power plant.

The company, Rosatom, said technicians would move tons of low-enriched uranium fuel from a storage site into the reactor on Aug. 21, the first of three steps in starting it up, a process that will take months.

The United States had asked Russia to delay the plant’s start-up, until Iran had stopped uranium enrichment and allayed concerns that it was using its civilian nuclear program as a cover for weapons development.


Well, that worked out well.


Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Lines In The Sand

One familiar theme I keep pursuing is the continual escalation by America's political Right of rhetoric and action that tends towards the absurd or the violent.

I'm not a professional historian, but I was originally trained as one. And in my main area of study (European history after 1815, with a focus on Mitteleuropa between 1914 and '45) there were plentiful examples of one side, or party; even scientists and artists, continually crossing lines. And the thing about crossing lines: Whether it's political or cultural, it's always about changing what is perceived as permissible.

And in this mid-cycle election year, there are more candidates for Congress -- all of them Republicans, or running as one -- spouting utterly crazy nonsense. Stupid nonsense, as if they had been raised on a diet of right-wing talk radio, where nothing has to relate to reality and there's no accountability for what gets said.



Rand Paul. Tommy Tancredo. Sharron Angle. Michelle Bachmann. Pat Toomey. Meg Whitman. Black helicopters, race miscegenation; attacks on southwestern cities by armies of Mexican drug lords; aliens in control of banks and governments. Stupid nonsense, man -- and that's just the most visible stuff.

There are 16-plus million people out of work; the National Debt is nearly $14 Trillion Dollars (Thanks, Lil' Boots!). Between 2 and 3 million gallons of oil were released into the Gulf. The Taliban are resurgent, still, in Afghanistan. What does the Fox Cable crap these pretend politicians keep spouting have to do with reality? Why do we coddle and enable this kind of adolescent behavior when the threats we face are so deadly serious?

In a way, this was the point of the post about Newt Gingrich below: When a person's statements or conduct are seen objectively as negative or harmful -- and none of that seems to affect their chances of being elected to high public office -- then something is fundamentally wrong... with our electoral system, with our media, with the culture.

At TPM Media, a reader sent an email which discussed this.

I understand there is a strong temptation to look at primary victories by extreme [Republican or Teabagger] candidates ... "good for Democrats." As a strong Democratic partisan I also see them that way... On the other hand, I find it disturbing that [an extremist candidate] was able to win the primary of a major political party.

As a Democrat, I want to say "See, look: the Republicans have gone crazy." But as an American I find the trend toward conspiracy theories and paranoia (on both the right and the left) profoundly disturbing.




It's simply not healthy for a Democracy when you have a relatively large percentage of the population believing crazy theories about plots against the United States executed by the UN, or a secret one-world government, or whatever it is these folks believe. This kind of paranoia is poisonous to a Democracy, and opens the doors to demagoguery of the most dangerous type.



Of course this is nothing new, this kind of thinking always seems to take hold to a certain degree during times of great stress and especially economic hardship. But the fact that this kind of thing is predictable does not make it any less dangerous. Having a major party candidate l...spouting this kind of nonsense only serves to further legitimize it, whether he wins or not. The press needs to be extremely vigilant against these kinds of delusions, ruthlessly exposing them to the cold light of fact and rationality.


Think Fox will do that? Little Rupert's business model is based on packaging and selling extremism, rumor and innuendo as fact. The Mainstream Media appears to treat it all as theater.



Seriously, in order for a Right-wing candidate (or, a politician) to be discredited, it almost seems that they would have to be caught, on camera, in a love nest with an underage, same-sex partner, while torturing and killing defenseless animals (Kind of a touchy issue with me).

And even then, Lard Boy would claim they'd been "set up" and victimized by a vicious, all-powerful liberal press; House Minority Leader Boner would publicly state that "we should wait for all the facts to come in", and the candidate would already be booking their initial 'comeback' appearance on Oprah.