Thursday, July 28, 2011

Very Very Very Stupefyingly Horrifically Bad Bad Bad Things

History

This is a critical and exceptionally sensitive moment in history, where the results of a long string of events (some political, others economic; others cultural) combine to create the same circumstances as Carl Sagan's 1983 description of the nuclear arms race after the ABC program, "The Day After" was broadcast (I'm paraphrasing): Imagine, if you will, a man standing in a room, up to his waist in gasoline. And in his hand is a package of matches.

That isn't meant to be funny. This is where we are now. I'm dead serious.

It doesn't only involve America's right-wing politics being hijacked by extremists and flown to Nowhere; it also involves Europe. It's not a Black Swan moment, because too many people have warned, predicted, and described in detail (with actual data to back up their analysis) what may be about to take place, and why. What astounds me, and others, is how all that information is being ignored in a fundamental way -- as if people and governments were incapable of making other choices.

But, possibly, the crisis points of the previous century looked the same to observers at the time: The beginnings of the First World War. The financial Crash of the late 20's and early 30's; the rise of Fascism and agitation from the Left; the Holocaust. There may have been observers who sounded their own Cassandra-like warnings then, too; I don't know.

Paul Krugman, who is quoted above, has provided a great deal of analysis about the current economic situation, and has been saying it publicly well before the Crash (remember those heady days of the Go-Go, 'Lil' Boots' Bush years?), that the financial and political events of the last fifteen years would have real, predictable effects in the world, and not only in America:
For some reason events in European bonds markets aren’t making big headlines. But they should be: even as the GOP does its best to destroy America’s credit, things are falling apart, with a vengeance, on the other side of the Atlantic.

The interest rate spread between Italian and German bonds is now higher than it was before the big European rescue package was announced. Since the purpose of that package was, first and foremost, to calm markets before Italy and Spain sank into self-fulfilling debt spirals, this is very bad news.

Also, German interest rates are plunging. This does not reflect greater confidence in German solvency; if anything, investors are less confident in that respect, as the potential costs of a peripheral bailout start to get reflected in credit assessments of the core economies. What this is surely about, instead, is the growing sense that European recovery is sputtering out, and that the European Central Bank — which sets short-term rates — will eventually call off or even reverse its planned rate hikes, with rates staying low for a long time.

In short, what the markets seem to be seeing is disaster on the periphery and the Japanification of the core. And I can’t say they’re wrong.
The 'peripheral' European countries (Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Italy; Greece) have been provided loans by the ECB, involving banks in the 'core' EU nations (primarily France and Germany). Two weeks ago, the ECB announced their most recent loan packages would mean Austerity programs in these 'peripheral' nations, which will actually create low growth and few jobs -- conditions exactly the opposite of what's needed to pay the loans back at all.

If any one of them can't meet their obligations (or their populations say "Fuck This!" to the New Austerity), that's the ball game. The remaining peripherals may tumble, and then the Euro -- that would effectively end the European Union in fact; its political structures aside, the EU is welded together by its common currency and not a twelve-starred flag.

The economies of the 'core' European countries -- principally France and Germany, whose banks are at the center of the loans made to the 'peripheral' EU nations -- will tumble, and suffer their own 'Japanification' -- high unemployment, low GDP growth and Zombie Banks unwinding debt. Japan's economy melted down (no pun intended) in the 1980's, due to their own massive real estate bubble, and TBTF banks carrying billions in worthless loans; their Recession lasted over ten years.
Simon Johnson writes about who’s worse — America or Europe? Basically I agree with his assessment: Europe has more fundamental problems in sheer economic terms, because it adopted a single currency without the necessary institutions to make it workable. America has a long-run budget problem, but our current mess is entirely political. Unfortunately, that doesn’t make it any easier to solve.

What’s extraordinary, though, is the paralysis that has taken over essentially the entire advanced world. America is hamstrung by its crazy right; Europe by its single currency that can be neither abandoned nor accompanied by sufficient reforms to make it work; Japan by lousy demography and monetary timidity that is now deeply ingrained in expectations.

Technology continues to advance; resource shortages are not severe enough to pose a major constraint; climate change is terrifying in its long-run implications, but hasn’t inflicted much damage yet. The only major problem we have right now is the one that was supposed to be easy to solve: a simple lack of adequate demand. And we’re totally failing in our response.
In our own country, we seem to have been afflicted by the Perfect Storm: Know-nothing Rethug Tea Partei brownshirts and tepid, rudderless Democrats. Krugman continues watching the Ship Of Fools head straight for the iceberg:
These are interesting times — and I mean that in the worst way... In the United States, right-wing fanatics in Congress may block a necessary rise in the debt ceiling, potentially wreaking havoc in world financial markets. Meanwhile, if the plan just agreed to by European heads of state fails to calm markets, we could see falling dominoes all across southern Europe — which would also wreak havoc in world financial markets.

... policy makers seem determined to perpetuate what I’ve taken to calling the Lesser Depression, the prolonged era of high unemployment that began with the Great Recession of 2007-2009 and continues to this day, more than two years after the recession supposedly ended...

The great housing bubble of the last decade, which was both an American and a European phenomenon, was accompanied by a huge rise in household debt. When the bubble burst, home construction plunged, and so did consumer spending as debt-burdened families cut back.

Everything might still have been O.K. if other major economic players had stepped up their spending, filling the gap left by the housing plunge and the consumer pullback. But nobody did. In particular, cash-rich corporations see no reason to invest that cash in the face of weak consumer demand.

Nor did governments do much to help. Some governments — those of weaker nations in Europe, and state and local governments here — were actually forced to slash spending in the face of falling revenues. And the modest efforts of stronger governments — including, yes, the Obama administration -- in those countries “under a programme” are being forced into drastic fiscal austerity, this amounts to a plan to have all of Europe slash spending at the same time. And there is nothing in the European data suggesting that the private sector will be ready to take up the slack in less than two years.

For those who know their 1930s history, this is all too familiar. If either of the current debt negotiations fails, we could be about to replay 1931, the global banking collapse that made the Great Depression great.

But, if the negotiations succeed, we will be set to replay the great mistake of 1937: the premature turn to fiscal contraction that derailed economic recovery and ensured that the Depression would last until World War II finally provided the boost the economy needed.

...There’s an old quotation, attributed to various people, that always comes to mind when I look at public policy: “You do not know, my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed.” Now that lack of wisdom is on full display, as policy elites on both sides of the Atlantic bungle the response to economic trauma, ignoring all the lessons of history. And the Lesser Depression goes on.
It seems clear that there are people like Krugman who can see, and describe, what is happening to the Western World's economies. In The U.S., common sense is overridden by political extremism. In Europe, the fragile political union appears ready to collapse under the financial extremism of Austerity programs.
Mr. Bush squandered the surplus of the late Clinton years, yet prominent pundits pretend that the two parties share equal blame for our debt problems. Paul Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, proposed a supposed deficit-reduction plan that included huge tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, then received an award for fiscal responsibility.

So there has been no pressure on the G.O.P. to show any kind of responsibility, or even rationality — and sure enough, it has gone off the deep end. If you’re surprised, that means that you were part of the problem...
The Tea-Partei-fueled failure to raise the debt ceiling could trigger a real panic in world financial markets, not just our own. And given the interconnected nature of the global banking system, a massive selloff in equities and the effect to businesses worldwide would at a minimum stall and reverse what little "recovery" from the Crash of 2008 has taken place.

At worst, it could create enough European banking instability to trigger a collapse of the fragile ECB loan structure, followed by a collapse of the Euro. If that happens, all bets are off.

The situation feels precariously balanced in too many places, and any one of them might be The trigger which brings everything down. What is a real possibility is a Day Of Reckoning for 'Too Big To Fail' banks, worldwide -- and what would follow would be difficult to imagine. My guess is that here, and in Europe, we would end up with businesses quickly cutting back, or closing, and in a relatively short period -- perhaps a short as six to nine months, certainly a year -- unemployment on a scale never seen in modern times and psychologically worse than The Great Depression of the 1930's.

These are the times we live in, and since they involve money and the artificiality of value our societies are based on, no matter what happens the results will hit us right where we live. Literally.


Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Just So You Know

None of the Kabuki theatre around the debt ceiling "crisis" is about the "debt".

Paul Krugman:
The facts of the crisis over the debt ceiling aren’t complicated. Republicans have, in effect, taken America hostage, threatening to undermine the economy and disrupt the essential business of government unless they get policy concessions they would never have been able to enact through legislation. And Democrats — who would have been justified in rejecting this extortion altogether — have, in fact, gone a long way toward meeting those Republican demands.
The past four-plus months of bullying by the Right is primarily about crushing the last vestiges of FDR's New Deal -- Social Security and Medicare. Secondarily, it's about embarrassing a Democratic President who happens to be African-American, boxing him into a corner where the debt "crisis" is only partially resolved (guaranteeing it will reappear again in six months and harming his chances for reelection), or forcing him to capitulate entirely.

But, mostly it's about realizing a long-held dream of domination and subjugation of Teh Hated Librul hippies. Because there was no other real reason to be in the spot we're currently in, no matter what President Boner and President Yertle The Turtle say. Just so you know.


"...We're Gonna Hurt Some People"

The Tell: Proof Of The Little Rupert Effect

Telling for what was Not Said: Per TPM, The Washington Post reported
...it's hard to imagine who was thinking what when House aides leaked to the Washington Post this eye-popping anecdote about a House GOP caucus meeting today in which leadership got their troops pumped up to support the Boehner debt bill with a scene from a gangster film where loyalty trumps morality and justifies brutal assault.
House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), the party's vote counter, began his talk by showing a clip from the movie, "The Town", trying to forge a sense of unity among the independent-minded caucus.

One character asks his friend: "I need your help. I can't tell you what it is. You can never ask me about it later."

"Whose car are we gonna take," the character says.

After showing the clip, Rep. Allen West (R-Fla.), one of the most outspoken critics of leadership among the 87 freshmen, stood up to speak, according to GOP aides.

"I'm ready to drive the car," West replied, surprising many Republicans by giving his full-throated support for the plan.
The problem with this is (as TPM's Brian Beutler points out), the full comment made by Ben Affleck is, I need your help. I can't tell you what it is; you can never ask me about it later; and we're gonna hurt some people.

The other problem is that the man standing up to say, "I'll drive the car" is Representative Allen West of Florida. That would be the same Allen West who, in Iraq in August of 2003 as a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army, brutalized a detainee in an interrogation and was forced out of his 22-year service career as a result.

But the Tell was -- the Post dropped the last part of Affleck's line (and we're gonna hurt some people) from their reporting of the story.

Why would they do that? The inference is obvious -- a bunch of Republican Congressmen, bonding around a film clip that equates loyalty with brutality; why didn't the Post report that?

The Post was once one of the three best journalistic organizations in the world, together with the New York Times and the UK's Times of London. However, Little Rupert bought the London Times in the mid 1980's; always conservative, its current journalistic standards aren't far above the now-defunct News Of The World; the Crafty Ol' Digger believes all the Public should be interested in are the Tits 'n Tattle his media provides.

The New York Times is still "the paper of record". It it still hasn't made up for Little Judy Miller, and often provides a little cheerleading for The Powers That Be; or contorts itself to report oh-so-neutrally when it should go for the jugular (and they don't print my online comments to articles, either; the bastards). However, the NYT is, along with the McClatchy papers, the last serious major media outlet left in America that generally practices a trustworthy reporting of facts once called "journalism".

Not so the Post. In the face of the dumbed-down, Beck and O'Reilly-smeared, Drudge-culture of our era, the newspaper which made "investigative journalism" a household phrase has stumbled on from printing lies to mislead Congress and the nation to support Lil' Boots' invasion of Iraq, to become just another right-leaning media outlet, trying to compete with Little Rupert's business model.

You won't hear Fox Faux News reporting that a bunch of Republicans geared up to support NEW AUSTERITY NOW! by listening to a film clip that equates the President Boner deficit plan with committing violence for revenge, supported by a former military officer cashiered because of his violent actions.

And why didn't the Post report it? Because that's exactly what the Rethugs want to do to the People of the United States of America: Hurt us.

I suppose that's no longer news. But it's time we all woke up to that fact.


Monday, July 25, 2011

How We Live Now

What's Happening With The Manufactured Debt Crisis Today?

(Photo: UK Telegraph 7/25/11 [No Other Attribution])
  • The Rethugs have firmly maintained that if they vote to raise the debt ceiling, the Democrats must not raise taxes in any way ever ever.
  • The Rethugs have said that cutting the deficit to reduce the National Debt must come through a Magic Plan that includes some combination of (a) Raising the age at which a person may begin to draw Social Security payments; (b) Freezing or providing for much smaller Cost Of Living Adjustments for Medicare coverage; (c) Cutting some government and defense spending (but not much); and (d) Reduce or eliminate many social programs funded by the Federal government.
  • The Rethugs have also said that when totaled, these cuts must be at least $2.4 Trillion dollars. When it was pointed out that this meant in essence that the wealthiest Americans would continue to reap huge benefits, while everyone else paid the cost in reduction of services and a lowered standard of living, the Rethugs chuckled. One or two may have smiled and said, "Of course". Originally, the Rethugs refused to consider any deviation from this Magic Plan.
  • Grudgingly, it seemed if the Rethugs couldn't get their Magic Plan, they might agree to some Rube Goldberg, stopgap measure which only kicked the can down the road: In less than a year, there would be another vote to raise the debt ceiling again, and we would be right where we are today with the Tea Partei holding a gun to the head of the country.
  • The Rethugs did this to provide maximum distraction and disruption to the Democrats, because they know Obama isn't a liberal and can be pushed; and, if he agrees to what they want, Progressives may desert him in 2012 and the Rethugs put Grand Turtlebear Bachmann in the White House. Or, Mittens; or Huntsman; or Reinhard Heydrich or Little Sarah; it doesn't matter to them who it is.
  • President Obama is a person of vision. He wanted a "Grand Bargain" which somehow magically cut things but not all things and made the Rethugs and our Owner Class happy, and solved all the problems and paved the way for a great Democratic victory in 2012.
  • The Rethugs smiled at this, and played him -- using a combination of their classic 'Lucy and the Football' routine, and constant threats of forcing the U.S. to default and then blaming it all on the Democrats' inability to compromise.
  • Over weeks of negotiation, the Democrats have apparently decided (a) It's permissible to cut Social Security and Medicare -- no matter what language they use to describe it; (b) They are also fine about cuts to social programs, and (c) Asked for new taxes to raise revenue, or allowing the fabled Bush Tax Cuts to expire; the Rethugs said no and Obama and the Democrats said okay. So much for a defense of social principles.
  • At some point between Wednesday and Friday of last week, apparently the Rethugs came back to the White House and threw a change-up (they're good for that) -- now, they couldn't agree to negotiate unless changes were made to the Health Care legislation Obama spent time and political capital to pass in 2009 (when he should have been trying to create jobs).

    We're playing chicken, all right. We have you in a bind, the Rethugs were telling him. Agree to what we want, or the country defaults and international markets plummet. Or, all you'll get is bridge funding that will ensure we keep this issue hot right into 2012. So give us everything -- and lose. Agree to stopgap funding while we 'negotiate' more cuts -- and lose. Or, refuse -- and lose. That's where we have you.

    Herr Obama understood he had been played for a chump. He may have understood that he doesn't have the communications skills (nor does his staff or Democrats generally, it seems) to explain to the Country how this happened, or why agreeing to what the Rethugs want is bad, and that this was all a manufactured crisis. So Obama became unhappy. President Boner got himself one, smiled, and walked out.
That's where we are now. No matter what happens from here, it's already been decided that you and I will pay for all of this. In ten years, the country we live in will be different -- even radically so -- than the America you see now.

And as we circle the drain, Paul Krugman has a few words.



Mehr: The Great Curmudgeon says also, too:
I think the largely unacknowledged bit of all of this nonsense is that most Republicans in Congress don't really want to cut spending, or more specifically they don't want to own cutting spending.

Their main concern is tax cuts for rich people, spending is secondary, and the deficit matters not at all to them. Sure they want to be seen as wanting to cut spending, in the abstract, because that's their brand, but they don't actually want to be responsible for the spending cuts.

Their position is: give us the cuts and don't make us vote for them. Their problem is that while the crazy teabaggers in Congress would generally be happy to vote for all kinds of spending cuts, they won't vote for them if they're attached to the debt ceiling. So that means Republicans more concerned with elections will have to vote for them, along with some Democrats.

by Atrios at 10:35

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Ein Mensch Ist Kein Tier!

The People Twitter
(A Person Is Not An Animal! -- Kurt Weill / Berthold Brecht, from the musical, Rise And Fall Of The City Of Mahogony [1929-1930])

People Text (Click To See Big Graphic -- It's Easy And Fun!)

Jeff Jarvis "is associate professor and director of the interactive journalism program and the new business models for news project at the City University of New York’s Graduate School of Journalism."

He's also pissed at the Kabuki circle jerk going on in that Village On The Potomac.
So I was angry. Watching TV news over dinner — turning my attention from scandals in the UK to those here and frankly welcoming the distraction from the tragedies in Norway — I listened to the latest from Washington about negotiations over the debt ceiling. It pissed me off. I’d had enough. After dinner, I tweeted: “Hey, Washington assholes, it’s our country, our economy, our money. Stop fucking with it.”

...That’s all I was going to say. I had no grand design on a revolution. I just wanted to get that off my chest. That’s what Twitter is for: offloading chests. Some people responded and retweeted, which pushed me to keep going, suggesting a chant: “FUCK YOU WASHINGTON.” Then the mellifluously monikered tweeter @boogerpussy suggested: “.@jeffjarvis Hashtag it: #FUCKYOUWASHINGTON.” Damn, I was ashamed I hadn’t done that. So I did.
The Very Serious People in Washington are, even now, determining that "shared sacrifice" means digging up the body of FDR to burn it in public, give the Rethugs what they want (even more, perhaps), and ensure that Our Top 2% are not made cross, are soothed and contented, and have Treats -- always.

The fact that Our Leaders have ignored creating jobs, and concentrated instead on Fluffing The Banksters and doing everything possible not to piss off any rich people, tells you that they're arrogant enough to ignore the 76-plus per cent of Americans who will be screwed by what they intend to do.

The poll percentages of voting-age people who disapprove of both parties (and the number who believe the Democrats, and Obama, aren't liberal enough) have never been higher since political opinion polls began to be taken. I'd recommend Our Serious Leaders pay attention to the Twitter machine, even if they believe it is Unserious and just a toy for dirty hippies and fringoids. I truly suggest it.


Saturday, July 23, 2011

A Reprint: Debt Ceiling Russian Roulette

Fear Hunter: Gun Su Mao, America

Something about the game of 'Debt Chicken' being played out between the Rethugs, and the Democrats (Aber Ganz Ohne Rücken), reminded me of Michael Cimino's 1978 film The Deer Hunter -- which included a long sequence where Robert DiNiro and Christopher Walken, taken captive by the VC/NVA, are forced to play Russian roulette (see the whole clip here at UTub).

The NVA cadre commander slaps the GI's, shouting GUN SU MAO! -- which, I assume, means "No tax increase! Bush Tax Cuts forever! Gut Social Security and Medicare NOW!"

The idea of someone being forced to play a game that involves putting a gun to the country's head, just for hysterically stupid political posturing, was an image I couldn't get rid of...

Mehr: This post is based on one, small part of an earlier creation by Max Udargo, which you should definitely see here. Max is the creator of Burton & Jefferson (long may they wave), and Peterbuilt Nixon, and is a much funnier dog than I am.





Norway Nightmare

I want to say this, right up front: In the United States, domestic terrorism is in fact committed by those on the Right. Period.

Don't agree? How many dirty hippie leftists plotted to destroy the Federal Building in Oklahoma City? How many bombs have been set off by "left-wing extremists"? How many family planning clinic doctors and nurses have been stalked and murdered by Buddhists? Or Progressives? Come on; how many?

How many organized groups of dirty hippies (some with illegal heavy weapons) publicly hail Marx and Lenin and claim they are "at war" with an illegal, 'occupation' government? How many churches, and alleged 'pastors', preach messages of exclusion, intolerance and hate towards Evangelicals? How many radio stations in America spew out a never-ending stream of hatred and bile towards conservatives, caucasians, and christians?

How many? How many?



You've probably seen something about yesterday's (apparent) car bomb in downtown Oslo, followed not long after by the massacre -- because that's precisely what it was -- of children and young adults at a summer camp organized by Norway's current majority Labor (i.e., liberal) party on Utoya Island just outside the Norwegian capital.

The New York Time's David Jolly reports that
The Norwegian police on Saturday charged a man they identified as a right-wing fundamentalist Christian in connection with a bombing in central Oslo and a shooting attack on a nearby island that killed at least 92 people. Officials said the death toll could climb as they continued to search for the missing...

Most of the 600 campers, many from political families, had gathered in the main assembly building for a briefing on the bombing in Oslo. Relatives of many of the youths worked in the vicinity of the blast.

As soon as the shooting started, people panicked, witnesses said, running in all directions, tumbling down the island’s rocky hill in an attempt to reach the sea. Even after many made it into the water, the gunman calmly and methodically shot at those who were swimming.

“People right behind me were shot,” said Helen Andreassen, 21, a political adviser for the Labor Party’s youth wing. “I heard shots right behind me. He was standing just by the water, using his rifle, just taking his time, aiming and shooting. It was a slaughter of young children.”

...“We are not sure whether he was alone or had help,” a police official, Roger Andresen, said at a televised news conference, adding: “What we know is that he is right-wing and a Christian fundamentalist.”


Friday, July 22, 2011

Your Moment Of Teh Not Funny

Lucy Triumphant. Again.


I agree with The Great Curmudgeon: There is no debt ceiling crisis. There never was.
Just a reminder that there is no debt ceiling crisis. There's a fake crisis started by Republicans and then embraced by the White House so that everyone gets to use the fake crisis to try to do unpopular things in such a way that nobody, in theory, actually gets the blame.

A few people need to show up in Congress in the middle of the night, cast a voice vote, and we can move on to the next fake crisis.
by Atrios at 14:56
Then, What Digby said.
... And next time, when Republicans ask for the total destruction of the Federal Government we must pray that they "surrender" again and agree to only destroy Medicare and Social Security. But the good news is that [the Democrats] have every right to fight your little hearts for what you believe in as long as you understand that it's inevitable you will lose.

The problem with all this is that we know that the president wanted to do a Big Transformational Deal To End All Deals since before he came into office and it is equally clear that he saw this as an opportunity not a roadblock to his agenda. So this idea that it was thrust upon the poor hapless president and his party is wrong. All negotiations have at least two parties or they aren't negotiations. And in our government system one of the parties holds the White House and one half of the congress. They are not powerless and they do have leverage over the Republicans. The idea that one faction in the House of Representatives trumps everything else is simply not true.

If that were true, Bill Clinton would never have survived impeachment. Indeed, plenty of Villagers insisted that he simply had to resign because it was all just so very awful. But he knew he had something on his side -- the power of the presidency itself and the backing of the American people. And until Barack Obama started pounding the drum for his Grand Bargain, a majority of the American people were indifferent to spending cuts and wanted him to focus like a laser beam on jobs. But he got on that bully pulpit and convinced them that he was elected to do Big Things and that a "balanced approach" to the horrors of deficits was imperative and they've come around quite smartly.

They also came around on the fact that raising the debt ceiling was absolutely necessary --- just in time for the House Democrats to be tarred as the crazed obstructionists if they object to this massive, unnecessary slashing of government at the worst possible time. I suspect that was sheer luck, but I will give the President credit for his timing.

One can only wonder what might have happened if he had done the same thing to convince the public that a clean debt ceiling vote was imperative instead and never put these cuts on the table in the first place.

As I'm writing this, Boehner is said to be walking away from the White House's offer to give them the moon and the congress is going to try to hammer out a deal over the week-end. The deadline really is looming now.


Your Moment Of Teh Funny

This must be shared with a wider world (courtesy of a comment by the Freddy el Desfibradddor [accept no imitations] at Fafblog!):
'Depressed' Ferret Flees Siberian Circus
15 July 2011
The Moscow Times

When Not Raining In Exciting Downtown Chita, Siberia, It Snows

A ferret has escaped a circus in the East Siberian city of Chita along with a monkey and a red-breasted parakeet — apparently because they all were feeling down due to bad weather.

"We believe the creatures have fled because of their depression — the rain in Chita just doesn't stop," the circus' art director, Zhanna Lazerson, told Interfax on Thursday.

"We found the monkey in a doghouse in the morning, and the two animals were cuddling in their sleep," she said. "But the search for the ferret and the parakeet goes on."

She said the escape has added to the animals' depression in the circus because the male parakeet was partnered on stage with a female parakeet who is now missing him.

The ferret is less missed, with Lazerson calling him a "terrible glutton, idle to the core."

Nevertheless, the troupe hopes that the animals will return to their circus home once they get really hungry.

Weather forecasts say the rain won't let up in Chita this week.

The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

*******

It's not the weather the animals are depressed about; it's their captivity and forced detainment. They are depressed because they get restless leg syndrome. They are depressed because they get claustrophobic more often than not. They are depressed because -- well, you get the idea.
- Caroline Stumm; Torpedo, Texas
Actually, no; I don't. But, hey -- what are the Intertubes for?


Congress Continues Debate Over Whether Or Not Nation Should Be Economically Ruined

Welcome To The 1930's
It is a question worthy of serious consideration: Should we take steps to avoid a crippling, decades-long depression that would lead to disastrous consequences on a worldwide scale? Or should we not do that?
-- House Guy Eric Cantor (R-Disneyland)
Edge of the Volcano. Funny ha ha ha ha ha.

Only, not so much. In the main, most people don't seem to understand this, which makes me wonder why we don't just change the name of our country to The Deutschland and start speaking German so that when Grand Turtlebear Bachmann and the Tea Partei come to power they can call it the New Deutschland, a godly nation, where the malcontents will be silenced, the children will be taught the real approved history of Things, and women will be barefoot, and the dirty hippies and unclean abomoinations LGBT people will be sent to her husband's clinics for The Cure, or they will be quietly and humanely put down in places where no one can see.

And the rest of us will go along because we will be Good New Deutschlanders. Just say Ja!