Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Im Abendrot

A Distant Drummer


Richard Strauss; Photographed At Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, 1930 (BBC)

I'm listening to music from a vanished world, just now: Kiri Te Kanawa's 1979 rendition of Four Last Songs and Orchestral Songs by Richard Strauss (1864 - 1949) (London Symphony Orchestra; Andrew Davis, Cond.; CBS Masterworks [CD] MK35140).

All of it is music from a world, twice-vanished, if you consider it. Strauss' Orchestral Songs were all written in the world of fin-de-siecle Vienna at the turn of the last century -- Strauss' personification of a composer both prophetic and (for a time) avant-garde; the measured movements and manners of the Hapsburg empire. Riding in the morning and walking on the Ring; pastries from Demel's; where women of the upper classes changed their clothing with their moods; and servants could be dismissed, without reference, their lives irreparably changed, over a trifle.



I've been reading Bill Bryson's At Home recently, and the one thing which stands out in contrast through the book is how hard and constricted the world was when you had no money, or legal protections. Considering only three hundred years of the 17th through the early 20th centuries (relatively more 'modern' and accessible to us than life in the Middle Ages or Renaissance), the "laboring and servant classes" worked far harder than you'd like to imagine.

I've had shitty jobs and bad circumstances in my time, but always had options. The working-class men and women of Strauss' day did not. Our 21st Century state of consciousness would perceive the lot of those without much money or power as unfair, exploited; wage slavery, and worse. And Strauss was among the upper ten per cent of European society by income, at least, if not the '1 per centers'.

That pre-August 1914 world, as Scott Fitzgerald pointed out, could not have existed without the sharp distinctions of class and wealth; still, it rested on the timbers of a thousand years of European culture -- and most of it was blown sky-high by the Great War. It's hard to reconcile the beauty of a Klimt, or Strauss' Mutterändelei, with four years of witless slaughter on the Western and Eastern fronts.

The guns stopped. The map of Europe was altered; the Hapsburg empire was gone. The cultural framework of Europe had been shaken on its foundations -- yet most of it was intact. There was still some continuity between the lost certainties of that Old World, and whatever lay ahead.

Tod, Und Verklärung

The nazis lionized Strauss after their rise to power in 1933, and in that same year appointed him head of the New Germany's Reichsmusikkammer (State Bureau of Music), which tacitly gave Strauss some control over state-sponsored presentation of music -- concerts, and opera.

The nazis did so because Hitler liked (some of) Strauss' music, and Little Joey Goebbels, the Rupert Murdoch of his times, flattered and manipulated Hitler whenever he could. He would use Strauss as a revered figurehead; but privately, Joey referred to Strauss as "a pipsqueak ... Unfortunately we still need him, but one day we shall have our own music and then ... no further need of this decadent neurotic". Outside Germany, reaction to Strauss' appointment was viewed by some as approval of the nazis; conductor Arturo Toscanini said publicly, "To Strauss the composer, I take off my hat. To Strauss the man I put it back on again."

Strauss continued to promote classical works by Jewish composers in concert, and continually faced pressure from nazi functionaries to stop. Then, in 1935, Strauss composed a comic opera with a friend, the Austrian novelist Stefan Zweig, who wrote the libretto. It opened in Dresden and was shut down by local nazi authorities because Zweig was Jewish; Strauss tried but could not force reopening the production.

"Do you believe I am ... guided by the thought that I am 'German'?" Strauss bitterly complained to Zweig, who had left Germany for England a year earlier, in a letter. "Do you suppose Mozart was consciously 'Aryan' when he composed? I recognize only two types of people: those who have talent and those who have none." The letter was intercepted by the Gestapo; subsequently, Strauss was dismissed as head of the Reichsmusikkammer. Zweig was able to leave Europe to the Americas, only to commit suicide with his wife in Brazil, in 1942 -- a not-uncommon occurrence among escapees from the nazi empire.

Strauss' son Franz was married; his wife, Alice, was Jewish. In 1938, she and her two children were placed under house arrest in Garmisch-Partenkirchen (where Strauss himself had moved in the 1920's). Strauss asked acquaintances in Berlin with nazi contacts to intervene and ensure they were not formally arrested (in 1938, incarceration as a means of extorting German or Austrian Jews of their money or property was common, particularly after the Anschluss). For the next six years, Strauss repeatedly had to ask, plead and beg the nazis for the lives of members of his family.

(An observation: Any person humbling themselves before ignorant bullies is saddening, distasteful. The more gifted and nuanced the individual, the more painful it must be. Given Strauss' revulsion over the nazis, I can only imagine what dealing with them on any level -- let alone begging them for mercy, based on nothing but the strength of his international reputation -- must have felt like.)

He drove to Theresienstadt concentration camp to ask for the release of Alice's mother, Marie von Grab (which was refused) and wrote letters to the SS pleading for the release of her children, his daughter-in law's brothers and sisters (the letters were ignored).

In 1942, he moved himself and his family from Garmisch back to Vienna. In the ten years after his brush with and dismissal by the nazis, Strauss suddenly became focused, more alive, composing some of his most nuanced and challenging work when he was in his seventies and eighties -- especially Metamorphosen (Metamorphosis), A Study For 23 Solo Strings, based on a soul-searching poem by Goethe concerning the causes of man's darker nature, particularly as it is expressed in war. He also produced The Rosenkavalier Suite in 1944, a reworking of the main themes in one of his most successful operas.

Also in 1944, while Strauss was out of Vienna, Franz and Alice and their children were arrested by the Gestapo and briefly imprisoned; only Strauss's asking the Gauleiter of Vienna, Baldur von Schirach (who liked Strauss' music), to intervene saved them from 'deportation'. Strauss took them back to Garmisch-Partenkirchen, where they survived for roughly another year under house arrest.

Zueignung

The European conflict in the Second World War ended with Germany's unconditional surrender on May 7, 1945.

Strauss wrote in his journal:
The most terrible period of human history is at an end, the twelve year reign of bestiality, ignorance and anti-culture under the greatest criminals, during which Germany's 2000 years of cultural evolution met its doom.
Strauss' Four Last Songs -- Spring, September; Before Sleeping and At Sunset -- were his Abscheid, a farewell, to the world he had been born into, erased by totalitarianism and allied bombing and aggressive war, by the ovens of Auschwitz-Birkenau.

But the Songs aren't a raging against the approach of night in the midst of destruction, the aftermath of depravity; they aren't a complaint. They're filled with Strauss' recognition of ending, but with the sense that his personal end is due, fitting: It's time. If anything, they're filled with tenderness, a compassion that sounds sorrowful, but echoes the recognition that ultimately life is in no way fair -- not for the laborer, nor the genius who feels the world through music.

The Last Songs were first performed by Kirsten Flagstad in May of 1950, eight months after Strauss' death. The Norwegian soprano was in her mid-fifties when premiering the works, and while she acquitted herself in performance there were questions beforehand whether she had enough tonal range left in her voice -- and, there were questions whether Flagstad herself (who had remained in Norway, never quite a collaborator but never really a resistor, during the nazi occupation) was the appropriate choice to sing Strauss' final Lieder.


Twelve Years From The London Recordings: Faster, Not Better

I've heard a number of renditions of the Last Songs by sopranos over the past thirty-plus years; my personal favorite is Te Kanawa's 1979 recordings, because she simply puts more of what I believe Strauss was feeling into her interpretation.

I first heard her, doing Beim Schlafengehen (Before Sleeping), one of the most soulful of the four, in the 1981 Australian film, "The Year Of Living Dangerously": Billy Kwan (Linda Hunt) puts on a record for Guy Hamilton (Mel Gibson) as operatic background to a scene of Gibson's romantic longing for British Embassy (and MI-6) officer, Sigourney Weaver (My girlfriend at the time loved the music, which gave me the opportunity to introduce her to Strauss, generally; sadly, that interest didn't develop. Neither did the romance).

Te Kanawa returned to do the Last Songs twelve years later, in a Decca recording with the Weiner Philharmoniker conducted by Georg Solti, and some of the same Orchestral Songs -- but this time, with only a piano accompaniment.

Scott Joplin once said, "It is never right to play Ragtime fast"... Solti's 1991 interpretation of these Lieder with Te Kanawa is definitely up tempo. It sounds and feels too hurried, for me -- particularly when I compare it with Kanawa's earlier rendition, where Davis let her communicate Strauss' bittersweet longing for life, even at its close, in every passage without reaching for low-hanging fruit.

It would be easy to play Joplin as if it were background music for a grainy, sepia-toned silent film, just as it's simpler to present Strauss and things Viennese as a confectioner's treat in saccharine, Art Noveau swirls, a surface appreciation of place and anguished sorrow at a lost world. It's a caricature.

But that wasn't the reality for Strauss in these compositions; he knew what he was about to lose, personally, and what the world had lost in the real events of his times. And Te Kanawa is an artist. Her work with Davis was a reaching for something in herself to connect with one man's expression of the terrible beauty of living. She succeeded.

Four Last Songs seems appropriate music, for me, these days. The sense that "Neroism is in the air", that we seem to be approaching... something, never feels very far away. Far I hear a steady drummer, drumming like a noise in dreams.

And when we get to the other side of whatever that approaching something is, will everything still seem familiar? Or, like Strauss, will we try our best to be true to -- not crumbling social forms... but to describing the truth of our own lives, expressing our experience as human beings, in whatever way is uniquely our own; even as it transfigures us?


Sunday, December 4, 2011

Two Minutes To Midnight

Investing In Canned Goods Might Be Prudent


Map Of Eurozone By Andrew Rae (New York Times, November 30, 2011)

It's difficult to say this without appearing to overstate, but the next week is a critical juncture in world history. The future of the European Union and its official currency, the Euro, is what's at stake. How the dice fall will affect the Western world.

The EU and its constituent leadership have tried coming together twice this year already and failed to find any agreement on how to resolve what has become a crisis not only in bank debt, but sovereign debt. Most of the EU's members have national debts far above their GDP's (the U.S., by comparison, is 'only' at 80-plus per cent).

For America, a failure by Europe's leaders to resolve that crisis will mean very serious consequences for our own fragile economy. I strongly recommend paying attention to what happens.

In as few words as possible: Sixteen years ago, to become a politically united force and reap the benefits of interdependence, Europe (with few holdouts, such as Great Britain) accepted a common currency. This allowed economic and trade cooperation, but maintained the sovereignty of each EU member nation's governments -- and their central banks, each tied to private banks that do business in each country.

Before the crash, some EU member governments had national debts in excess of 100% of their GDP. The EU has seventeen economies and seventeen central banks, each having a loose association with the European Central Bank (ECB), which acts primarily as a clearinghouse for issues related to the Euro. The ECB also had the ability to put together loan packages from banks in the Eurozone if necessary.

When the Made In USA™ 2007 real estate-backed securities / derivative crisis affected those private banks, governments worldwide were advised either protect your banks or face a worldwide financial Armageddon. Like us, their finance ministers and advisors believed they had no other choice but to bail out the institutions which had helped create the crisis.

What were private debts became public. Before the crisis, governments in Greece, Spain, Ireland and Portugal, Slovakia and Italy had been overextended; taking on billions in bank debts made them even shakier. It wasn't long before loan packages from the ECB became necessary -- to shore up the banks, prevent the contagion from spreading.

In the three years since the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers, Bear-Stearns and Countrywide Financial, the EU lurched from one crisis to another as Europe's banks (who always seemed to have understated how much debt they really held; surprise!) needed even more "assistance". Then, the ECB began putting loan packages together to shore up the European governments themselves -- Spain, Ireland and Portugal, and (several times) Greece.

These were always intended to be band-aids -- because to qualify for ECB loans (backed primarily by healthier German and French banks), the EU members had to promise to reduce their government debt. The only way to do this was through voluntary Austerity programs: Cutting government programs, civil service wages and pensions, and selling or 'privatizing' government assets.

That would mean a drastic fall in the standard of living and the quality of life for millions of Europeans -- but worst of all, it would mean the economies of Europe would be caught in a vicious spiral of cost-cutting, leading to more businesses closing and jobs lost, leading to more economic contraction. This couldn't be clearer; events and data have already proven it in England and Greece.

Even so, this Austerity has been an unshakable demand of both Germany's Angela Merkel and French President Nicholas Sarkozy, whose nations are not as overextended as the rest of the EU.

Now, all the possible fixes and band-aids that could be applied to the situation through the ECB, and EFSF rescue fund have been done, and it clearly isn't enough. There is a summit of EU leaders taking place in Brussels beginning today, and lasting through December 9th. As David Gow for the UK Guardian reports,
Europe has five days to find a solution to the sovereign debt crisis or else the EU itself will collapse, political leaders warned on Sunday at the start of a week of high-stakes summitry.

Torn between the need for stability and the desire for solidarity, EU leaders have to find an immediate fix for the broken eurozone and embrace a longer-term plan for fiscal union by Friday night...

Senior opposition politicians put severe pressure on French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel ahead of their pre-summit talks in Paris on Monday to approve a "grand bargain" or, at least, workable plan that will gain the support of partners such as the US.

Timothy Geithner, Treasury secretary, will be in Europe for talks all week.

Sarkozy's main opponent in next spring's presidential election, socialist leader François Hollande, accused him of caving into German demands for a new EU treaty on budgets that was bound to fail, exacerbating French weakness in an unbalanced relationship with Berlin and ignoring the need for immediate solutions.

So far, Merkel's notion of what's needed is a rewriting of sections in the European Union Treaty itself -- making economic policy a permanent part of the political association. For Europeans who still remember a Europe dominated by a resurgent (nazi) Germany, the idea that the EU will be redefined and effectively led by Die Deutschen is uncomfortable.

Merkel has resisted the possibility that the next level of 'fix' for the crisis lies through the issuing of 'Eurobonds' -- treasuries which could be traded on the international market, bought by the world's financial community and other non-EU governments (like the U.S., say, or Saudi Arabia, or China).

That wouldn't require a rewriting of the EU Treaty, but might demand that EU member governments would give up some amount of control over their own economies -- to the ECB, or some special EU commission -- and again, there are many in Europe who don't (as they see it) want to give the Germans, with the French as their handmaidens, that much power over their sovereign states.

Another aspect of issuing Eurobonds is, would anyone buy them? The most recent auction of German treasury bonds was almost a failure; Italian treasuries sold, a little, but with higher interest rates. 'The Market', which EU ministers want to calm and give assurances to, seems not to trust the ability of EU governments to make good on their issuance of debt.

And underneath every plan to save the day, Austerity is the only hope.
Philipp Rössler, economy minister, rejected eurobonds outright but Günter Oettinger, an EU commissioner and member of Merkel's CDU, said they could not be excluded categorically.

Mark Rutte, Dutch premier, said: "It is really important that the markets see that Europe is prepared to help the countries in trouble, so long as those countries commit to very tough reforms and austerity programmes."
And there are no shortage of shills for Austerity as a morality play here at home. Jonathan Chait in the NYT ("Godzilla vs. Bambi, Op-Ed Edition", December 2nd) compared the bullshit views of Little Davey "Bucky The BoBo Beaver" Brooks with that of Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman:
David Brooks today devotes his column on Europe to the familiar conservative morality tale, in which the European countries in trouble are paying the price for their slothful, profligate ways:
Over the past few decades, several European nations, like Germany and the Netherlands, have played by the rules and practiced good governance. They have lived within their means, undertaken painful reforms, enhanced their competitiveness and reinforced good values. Now they are being brutally browbeaten for not wanting to bail out nations like Greece, Italy and Spain, which did not do these things, which instead borrowed huge amounts of money that they are choosing not to repay.
Does anybody else on the Times op-ed page care to rebut this? Perhaps somebody who has glanced at the relevant data? Yes, you there, the bearded man with the Nobel Prize in economics:
How did things go so wrong? The answer you hear all the time is that the euro crisis was caused by fiscal irresponsibility. Turn on your TV and you’re very likely to find some pundit declaring that if America doesn’t slash spending we’ll end up like Greece. Greeeeeece!

But the truth is nearly the opposite. …

Only Greece ran large budget deficits during the good years; Spain actually had a surplus on the eve of the crisis.
On his blog, Krugman also has a chart showing that Italy and Spain both had shrinking debts as a percentage of GDP in the dozen years before the crisis.
The global financial system is so deeply interwoven by counterparty obligations, derivatives, and the Great Overnight Tides Of Financing which allow so many institutions to appear solvent (MFGlobal, no?). The amount of debt which banks and governments are attempting to deleverage themselves from is so vast (and among governments, growing by month, quarter and year) that all the best-laid plans seem nothing more than misdirection, a kick-the-can-down-the-road, Three-Card Monte scheme to buy a few more months or weeks.

So, too, Europe. I just don't have any confidence the current situation can end well. Issuing Eurobonds may temporarily increase 'market confidence' (expect 'big gains' in the Dow and SPX if it happens) and might work as a foundation for a more permanent solution, if there were wise men and women at the helm.

But there aren't. Merkel and Sarkozy, and supporters (such as England's Conservatives, busy running Britain into the ground), demand Austerity from the simple folk -- that the EU's citizens pay for the failure of their governments to protect them from the very financial institutions which participated in a global ponzi scheme, and are now being defended by those same governments -- and only governments who "commit to very tough reforms and austerity programmes" will be taken seriously. Get with the programme, you Keynesian heretics.

(Otherwise, they may have to fall -- as they did in Greece, and Slovakia, and Italy. Now, Papandrou's government was politically unpopular; and Corrupt Clown Prince Berlusconi was a self-perpetuating joke. And, Sarkozy did say that 'regime change' was not the intention of EU economic policy. Even so...)

To be fair, Merkel and Sarkozy, et Cie, are trying to maintain a political European Union, and at the same time address the reality of seventeen nations, independent, but financially interdependent through use of the Euro.

The single currency bound Europe in better times, and holds its members hostage in crisis -- in the same way seventeen people, trying to escape a burning building, are hobbled by being tied at the ankle to a single chest full of Euros. It will take all seventeen to pull the Eurochest out of the building before it collapses; they'll be burned but alive, though financially damaged. But if one or more of them untie themselves from the Euro and run for it, they may all may die.

As EU member states hand over some control of their sovereign finances to the EU in exchange for a promised security, the resulting loss of growth -- precisely what's happened in England -- will strangle Europe's overall economy. The only security will be for the financial houses or Europe, and America. And a very small percentage of the world's population; the Owner Class.

Again -- as in our own country -- citizens of the EU will pay, for generations, for the sins of a relatively small group of greedy, rapacious, financial oligarchs.


Saturday, December 3, 2011

Nur In Amerika

Wir Einen Neues Blog-Kategorie Eröffnen!

Sie wussten, dass wir in Amerika verrückt haben (you knew we were nuts over here), but we finally made a decision to highlight it in the same manner as major media outlets the world over. Warum nicht? Es gibt so viel davon.


CNN-Site (Klicken Für Grosser Graphik -- Leicht Und Spaß!)

For example, a focus of CNN's website is in highlighting an endless parade of videos and short articles on wacky mix-ups, and mall shootings, and that special brand of religiously-fueled intolerance which America specializes in. Their business model is based on a little titillation, a little news, and a little That's Amazing, America! videos of cute puppies and babies and kids beating the crap out of each other at school.


Little Rupert's 'News' - Note: As Herman Cain Disappears, Huckabee Quietly Reappears (Klicken Für Ein Grosser Graphik Zu Sehen -- Leicht Und Spaß!)

Little Rupert's Fox 'news' does the same thing, except they add a definite fascisimus right-wing twist. Where CNN presents the Crazy as part of the passing show, Little Rupert's Fox defends the xtian religious and Tea Partei babblers and Austerity economists because that's what their business model is based on -- that, and defending the bullies in videos where kids are beating the crap out of each other at school.

The Right-Wing scramble to find a candidate to run against Barack Obama in 2012 goes on -- often called "The Murdoch Primary", as the support of Little Rupert's NewsCorp (the media mouthpiece for the Right in Europe and America) tends to be one of the key factors in which candidate climbs to the top of the swine herd.

Today, Herman Cain's candidacy completed its self-destruction as Herm announced in Atlanta that his campaign was "suspended". Almost immediately, Little Rupert's Fox started mentioning the xtian fundamentalist ex-governor, Mike Huckabee (see the image above).

I would guess that means Newt Gingrich hasn't understood Little Rupert's Personal Fat Boy Fox 'news' editor Roger Ailes when he said Götz von Berlichingen [Our English-speaking readers can use a search engine to catch up]. Once Newt has puckered up, perhaps Little Rupert will give him a bit of favorable coverage.

In any event, we'll be turning this cyberforum into arenas of terror and shame for the superintelligent Parakeet and all three of our European viewers, via updates on the massive fun and merry mix-ups that come with life in Amerika. Viel Spaß Für Dich -- because you are there, and don't have to experience it here.


Friday, December 2, 2011

Saturday, November 26, 2011

A Reprint: Closer, Mein Weimar, To Thee

[This originally appeared on March 5, 2010; it's no less true today than it was almost two years ago -- which should give you an idea how little progress had been made since then, how much more polarized we are; and how much more powerless in the face of The Powers That Be, bless their tiny white cotton socks.

But then, too, also, of course, we hadn't offed bin Laden yet -- so, I guess that makes up for everything. USA !! USA !!]



Class War And A Simple Country Hyperchicken

I've mentioned Paul Krugman, Nobel Prize-winning Economist and regular columnist for the New York Times, before.

In today's column, Krugman says flatly that there is no 'bipartisan' Washington; Republicans are determined to force the Democrats to fail, even if by doing so they appear less like fiscal conservatives and more like people who kick dogs and ignore starving orphans.

What Krugman used as his initial focus was the recent, one-man Filibuster by Senator Jim Bunning of Kentucky. Bunning was determined not to allow a bill to pass which would provide a one-month extension of unemployment and COBRA medical insurance benefits to approximately 100,000 workers -- and these were former Federal employees (Talk about biting the hand that used to serve you, huh?).


Former Phillies' All-Star Turned Nasty Greedy Crazy™
(Photo: SALON)

Bunning has been acting... a little weird, lately; angrily pushing away reporters and yelling at a Rotary Club questioner, and delivering heavily scripted remarks at campaign events in a halting monotone. Bunning travels with a special police escort, at taxpayer expense -- he says, because Al-Qaeda is out to get him.

Then, Bunning -- who is virtually unopposed in the upcoming midterm elections, spent nearly a full month in the U.S. Senate raging against a bill, almost single-handedly slowing the work of the Senate to a crawl and forcing all eyes on him.


Bunning Begins His Famous Filibuster

Democrats and Republicans live in different universes [Krugman noted], both intellectually and morally...

During the debate over unemployment benefits, Senator Jeff Merkley, a Democrat of Oregon, made a plea for action on behalf of those in need. In response, Mr. Bunning blurted out an expletive. That was undignified — but not that different, in substance, from the position of leading Republicans.


Merkley once ran Habitat For Humanity, the non-denominational organization which builds homes for the poor, in Oregon. Bunning, in addition to his Senate salary of $174,000, takes a hefty annual paycheck home as the head of the 'Jim Bunning Foundation' -- which, basically, does nothing but sell autographed baseballs, and is supposed to donate the funds to charity -- something that's now coming under more scrutiny.

When Merkley spoke on the senate floor about the direct effects upon people of Bunning's month-long Filibuster, the esteemed Senator From Kentucky (who was standing at another podium) said, "Tough Shit".


Obligatory Photo Of Cute Animal, Embedded In Political Rant
(Now With 52% More Handgun!)

The extension bill directly affected families trying to feed themselves and stay in their homes, and have COBRA health insurance. Even so, Little Jimmy was determined to use every possible avenue in the Senate's rules to delay or kill the bill's passage.

Krugman held up Brunning, his use of his position in the Senate, and power as a U.S. Senator, to show three things: (1) Washington is so polarized that it would be a comedy program, if it weren't so deadly serious in its consequences for the United States; (2) Brunning's actions, and those of Republicans in Congress generally, point out what part of America they really represent -- and the same for the Democrats; and (3) this is disastrous for our country, and isn't going to end anytime soon.



Take the question of helping the unemployed in the middle of a deep slump. What Democrats believe is what textbook economics says: that when the economy is deeply depressed, extending unemployment benefits not only helps those in need, it also reduces unemployment... But that’s not how Republicans see it.... Senator Jon Kyl of Arizona, the second-ranking Republican in the Senate, [said] defending Mr. Bunning’s position...: unemployment relief “doesn’t create new jobs. In fact... continuing to pay people unemployment compensation is a disincentive for them to seek new work.”

Bottom Line: The Republicans, while very organized, seem to represent The Rich. The Democrats don't appear to be very well organized, but they represent the Rest Of Us. If it were left to the Rethugs, the spirit that controls our government, and our culture, would be that deep belief of the Protestants who came to settle in North America in the early 1600's... that the world is separated into the Elect of God (chosen by predestination for salvation and eternal life), and The Rest Of Us (not chosen, and so already damned to Hell For Ever).



The Chosen are, of course, the wealthy -- to those same early Prots, worldly success being proof of god's favor. The reverse, then -- Poverty -- is proof of god's disfavor -- and who cares what happens to people who will burn for all eternity, anyway? Screw 'em.

(Incidentally -- d'ya think this might be one reason that the period of intellectual flowering which began in the 1700's was called 'The Enlightenment'? Huh?)

Part of me believes that the Right wants a polarized, paralyzed central government. The more effective a strong centralized government is, the more economic and legal rights of the largest number of its citizens is protected. The less effective it is, life comes down to how much money and power you have -- and, as usual, the ordinary citizen has less of both.


1936 Poster Advertising The New Social Security Program
(Photo: Smithsonian Collection; Common Use)

The struggle between Left and Right in America is ultimately about something that we're not supposed to have -- a Class Structure. The Left says we shouldn't have one, and the kind of laws Democrats enact, by and large, are social programs which benefit the majority of the population -- who are the people (at least, supposedly) that the Democratic party represents.

And, the Left believes it's fair that taxes are used to pay for those social programs, since we all have a stake in what those programs do for the country, and our culture.

Cooperation and collaboration are hallmarks of this kind of political philosophy -- summed up by Robert Kennedy's quoting Shaw: Some people see things as they are and say, why? I dream of things that never were and say, why not?

The Left believes that 'Market Forces' or 'Private Interests' don't keep the welfare of individual citizens -- their health, safety or longevity -- in mind, unless forced to do so by law and regulation. And when they aren't, you get what's just happened: Powerful Banking and Investment interests out of control; an economy kicked to the curb; millions of people who may be without steady employment for years. The effect upon millions of lives of the acts of a relatively small group of men, allowed to do almost anything they wanted, hasn't even begun to be calculated or felt.


Italian Poster For The Venice General Association --
A Riskier Form Of Retirement; The 'Association' Is
Part Of The Free-Market (Ayn Rand Hearts Mussolini)

The Right doesn't care about protecting citizens from the excesses and predations of Wall Street, or a chemical company polluting the air or our water. Republican legislation promotes and defends those interests. They don't represent the largest section of our population, but that smaller, wealthier and more influential number of Americans -- the ten or so per cent who own 60%-plus of the nation... that's who the Republicans represent.

Republican legislation reflects a world view of 'free enterprise', and 'less government meddling with individual and property rights'. In fact, it reflects Social Darwinism, nature red in tooth and claw -- and aggressive competition, where the winners step on the faces of the losers as they march forward into that bright, new Tomorrow. It's an old-school-tie, who-you-know (or who you can pay off) kind of world, and if you can't pay, then (as Little Jimmy Bunning would say) Tough Shit.

A good quote for the Right (wherever it came from) is, The Future Is For The Strong. There's no room in that future for the poor, the sick, the weak. They're going to burn, anyway, so to hell with 'em.

So, Krugman goes on to say ... what are the implications of this total divergence in views [between Democrats and Republicans]?

The answer, of course, is that bipartisanship is now a foolish dream. How can the parties agree on policy when they have utterly different visions of how the economy works, when one party feels for the unemployed, while the other weeps over affluent victims of the “death tax”?


I don't know who will win that contest. But I do know who will lose, in the meantime -- and what we stand to lose if the wrong crowd is the winner.



Postscript, November 2011: (From Wikipedia:)
In January 2009, when asked whether Bunning was the best candidate to run or whether there were better GOP candidates for Bunning's Senate seat, National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman John Cornyn said: "I don't know. I think it's really up to Senator Bunning." Bunning replied: "Anybody can run for anything they choose. I am gearing up..."

...In a press conference ... Bunning called Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell a "control freak": "If Mitch McConnell doesn't endorse me, it could be the best thing that ever happened to me in Kentucky."

...Bunning announced he would not run for re-election in 2010, blaming fellow Republicans for doing "everything in their power to dry up my fundraising." On April 14, 2010, in a further show of disdain for GOP leadership and insiders, Bunning announced his support for outsider candidate Rand Paul over establishment favorite Trey Grayson.
And we've all see what sterling representation Rand Paul has provided both the State O' Kentucky, and his public sagacity as a Rethug candidate for the Presidency in 2012 -- as one mentally disturbed person replaced another in the Pay For Play Republican Tea Partei.

And, in July and August, during the so-called Debt Ceiling Crisis manufactured by that same Partei, President Obama tried to broker a 'Grand Bargain', bipartisan compromise. He offered cuts in Medicare and Social Security, if the Rethugs would accept new taxation to raise revenues (Sounds familiar, doesn't it -- the SuperCommittee Crisis, no?)

The Democrats did what they've done since 1994, wanting to be seen publicly as willing to compromise in the public interest, to be the adults in the room... only, the people Obama was dealing with weren't adults. In fact, they're closer to Mussolini than John Adams.

In the summer of 2011, they were willing to hold the government's ability to operate hostage to finally destroy the New Deal, and eliminate any barriers that would prevent the unimpeded stampede of Free Enterprise across America.

Reading Paul Krugman's take on bipartisanship in March of 2010, nineteen months ago -- I'd say he had it right. The Democrats didn't listen then, and may not be listening now. And, my feelings about the Right Wing in America haven't changed, either: I still feel my analysis is true today. Even more so, actually.

But, I'm only a Dog, and no one listens to me.


Friday, November 25, 2011

Two-And-A-Half Minutes To Midnight

Move More Deck Chairs To Starboard, And Ignore That Iceberg


Not Sure The Word "Ignition" Should Be Used Near The Global Economy --
And, We Didn't Make Up The Headline (Business Insider, 11/25/11)

There are plentiful signs that the 'Euro crisis', an exceptionally complex situation, cannot come to a good end no matter how brave a face Little Angela and Nicky put on it.
... according to Gareth Gore in the International Financing Review(:)
European banks are being forced to abandon their efforts to sell off trillions of euros worth of loans, mortgages and real estate after a series of talks with potential investors broke down, leaving many already struggling firms with piles of assets they can barely support.

Lenders have instead turned their attention to reducing the burden of carrying such assets over months and years, with many looking at popular pre-crisis “capital alchemy” arrangements to minimise capital requirements and boost their ability to use the assets to tap central banks for cash.

Deadlocked talks with potential buyers – a mix of private equity firms, hedge funds, foreign banks and insurers – show little sign of making breakthroughs, say bankers taking part in those negotiations, with the stalemate threatening to block the industry’s ability to save itself from collapse through a mass deleveraging.

“European banks have spent far too long saying everything is fine, when it really isn’t,” said one banker at a US bank who has been advising European clients on their options. “They are slowly realising that they just won’t be able to do what the market is expecting. We are edging slowly closer to the depths of the crisis.”

Some of Europe’s largest banks, including BNP Paribas and Societe Generale, have in recent weeks pledged to sell assets. Together, firms are expected to shrink their balance sheets by as much as €5trn over the next three years – equivalent to about 20% of the region’s total annual economic output – through a combination of sales, asset run-off and recapitalisations.
(The banks want to sell their assets near "par"--the value the banks are carrying the assets for on their books--because then the banks won't have to take losses that would further deplete their capital. The buyers, meanwhile, want deals, and they know that time is working in their favor.)

So now that banks are moving to Plan B... which is financial engineering.

Specifically, the banks are packaging up bunches of crap assets, putting pretty bows on the packages, and then using the packages as "collateral" with which to obtain emergency loans from the ECB...

Even if the European banks can engineer a way to get themselves the funding they need to survive, they're still planning to significantly reduce the amount of credit they're extending. And although this is wise for the banks, it's bad news for the economy.
No EU leader, or The American President and Timmeh! Giethner, and Helicopter Ben, the Secret Lizard from Acturus, will change their economic policies. The EU leaders can't, or (they believe) risk dissolving the Euro and unraveling the "idea" of a United Europe. They want Austerity and low growth, because it will keep Yurp's Bad Bad Rotten To The Core Banks from failing, and so imploding the international 'Markets'.

Here in America, Herr Obama is playing a game of electoral Chicken, hoping that the mass of citizens will see the Evil Rethug Tea Partei as the Enemy Of All That Is Good. He wants to make the Presidential election about a choice between Darth Vader and the Empire, or the plucky Rebellion, even though he will deny it's a Good-vs-Evil drama if asked.

Meanwhile, the Right continues to hijack the country by derailing the Doomed-To-Fail SuperChicken Committee, where they refuse to raise taxes because poor should pay and the rich should be pampered, live softly, and have treats. And the dirty hippies in the street? Ahhh, Fuck 'em. We beat, arrested, shot them and derided them forty-four years ago; we can do it again.


Only The Spirit Of The Past Can Save Us, Say Republican Stalwarts

And no matter what Bucky, The 'Chunky BoBo' Beaver says, The Rethugs are playing their own game of Chicken: They want Europe to implode. They're hoping the economy will deteriorate even further, and if human beings suffer in the process... well, it's all in a good and sacred cause -- to retake control of the country for god and jesus, and Unimpeded Free Enterprise. Gotta break a few eggs, sometimes, ya know; gotta see the Bigger Picture! YAAAH-Hooo YAAAH-Hooo YAAAH-Hooo!!

It's a full court press. The Democrats keep wanting to compromise, when that's an impossibility. They're dealing with sociopathic predators who only know and respect power, and for whom winning is everything. Whenever Democrats respond in kind, the Rethugs whine and scream: Class Warfare! Muslim Islam Mormon Catholic UN Black Helicopter Socialist Dirty George Soros Hippie One World Gov'mint!!!


Crazy Lady Says Only Hoping For The Apocalypse Will Save America From Porn, And Muslims

The higher the unemployment rate, the more the Rethugs can lie to the country through the huge megaphone of Little Rupert's NewCorp ... that it's all the fault of that Bad Illegitimate Socialist Kenyan Nigra Up The White House what thinks he Prestident. They'll repeat it over, and over and over and over.

And just to show you what kind of Edge-Of-The-Volcano? Let's Dance! times we live in, there's a misbegotten freakshow rumor making the rounds inside the Beltway -- the only part of America that matters, you see -- that retired ex-Senator Mutant Zombie Republican DINO Evan Bayh might try to run as a third-party / primary challenger to Obama... because he's a 'centrist', and someone who can rise above the partisan fray, and lead America back to its Destiny, and that's So Just What We Need Now. So there.

Right. Meanwhile, no one in a responsible position of authority does... anything.


Thursday, November 24, 2011

All Hail The Medium Lobster

Because This You Must Know


He Loves Most Of You; The Rest -- Hoo Boy! You Got Big Problems.

Medium Lobster! There is no Lobster but He - the Living, The Self-subsisting, the Eternal. No slumber can seize Him Nor Sleep. His are all things In the heavens and on earth and under the oceans. Who is there that can intercede In His presence except as He permitteth? He knoweth What (appeareth to All as) Before or After or Behind them. Nor shall they compass Aught of His knowledge Except as He willeth. His throne doth extend Over the heavens and the earth, and He feeleth No fatigue in guarding and preserving them, For He is the Most High, The Supreme (in glory). He is Medium Lobster, the One and Only.
-- by Anonymous, at April 02, 2008 10:03 AM

I dreamed he was iridescent red an green an he had frickin' laser beams comin' outta his head. And he smelled like a fish tank.
-- by Laptop Battery, at August 08, 2011 4:12 AM

MEHR:I want to know what Laptop Battery was on at 4:12 in the friggin' morning when he extolled his Big Vision Of The Lobster.

Why? 'Cause I can -- therefore, I am. Wanting to know what's in the mind of commenters about The Medium Lobster is the new standard for an awareness of existence. It is, you'll agree, less obnoxious than fucking over billions of other humans to amass huge amounts of wealth, just to prove to yourself you exist. So just get used to it.


Thanksgiving

All Righty Then

Thanksgiving: I'm not in a particularly cheery mood today; however, it's virtually indistinguishable from how I appear on most days during the year.

But, there are a large number of people who are trying hard -- harder than I am, in fact -- to find a spark of humankindness and family warmth today, and I won't offer a syllable of criticism about that. We need all the humankindness we can get.


Obigatory Cute Small Animal Photo Of Junge Und Ente In Middle Of Blog Thing


Tuesday, November 22, 2011

John Neville (1925-2011)

The Age Of Reason: Tuesday

Neville As Karl August Friedrich Hieronymous, Baron von Munchausen
The Right Ordinary Horatio Jackson: It seems to me, sir, that you have rather a weak grasp of reality.

Baron von Munchausen: Your 'reality', sir, is lies and balderdash -- and I'm delighted to say I have no grasp of it, whatsoever!

--  Johnathan Pryce, John Neville, The Adventures Of Baron Munchausen (1988)
Dir: Terry Gillam