Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Little Glenn Beck Vows To Fight, Die Like Martyr Hero Ground Sloth

The Uh, Something, Is Now


SOMEWHERE, USA: Teevee leader Little Glenn Beck, eight years old, vowed to fight on to his "last drop of blood" and roared at his supporters to buy more precious metal futures via 'Goldline', shouting and pounding his fist in a furious appearance this week after continuing media polls show he has lost two-thirds of his 2010 audience.

It was (yet) another occasion where the conservative teevee host appeared to talk about the imminent upheaval of "a world in chaos", and what he claims is the evil of George Soros, with maps drawn on a blackboard in chalk. Wearing brown robes and a turban, a dark blue blazer and rep tie, or Lederhosen, Beck spoke from behind a podium via Fox 'News' in the studio used to present his interpretations of history, finance, and religion to an ever-shrinking audience.

At times the camera panned back to show a towering monument of a navy blue-and-white-colored fist (Fox's 'official' colors) crushing an American voter. But at the same time, the view gave a surreal image of the teevee commentator, shouting and waving his arms wildly, standing alone in a studio with no audience, surrounded by a set of false walls and broken tiles dangling from the ceiling.

"America wants glory, America wants to be at the pinnacle, at the pinnacle of the world," Beck proclaimed, pounding his fist on the podium. "It's what god wants, god has told me to speak and to fight on because I am a fighter -- someone who has always fought the good fight, because I fight. I fight the fighting... you might say I am a fighting man who fights -- a fighting fighter, in a word..."

Obligatory Cute Small Animal Photo In Fake News Story

"I will die as a martyr at the end," he added, vowing to fight "to the last drop of blood," and exhorting his listeners to invest in more gold and large tubs of freeze-dried food.

Nielsen ratings showed that approximately seventy-five people sat in front of teevees which showed Mr. Beck's hour-long monologue. There is a 22.3% possibility that some of them were awake during portions of the program. There is also an 8.24% possibility that some of them were dead.

Asked for a comment about the continuing antics of Mr. Beck, his employer, Little Rupert Murdoch, smiled and climbed into his chauffeured, armored Bentley.



[With apologies to MAGGIE MICHAEL and SARAH EL DEEB of the Associated Press, for their story (via Salon online magazine), "Libyan President Moammar Gadhafi vows to fight on, die a martyr -- The embattled dictator unleashes a defiant, angry, rambling speech on state television".]


Monday, February 21, 2011

Yes We Can Can

From Japan With (Blow Up Girl) Love

$2.80 US Gets You A Short Stack, Butter And Syrup; In A Can

All right; given all the changes occurring in the (non-Western) world, it's time to inaugurate a New Blog Category: Yes We Can In A Can, featuring the stupid and irredeemably bizarre amazing things one can get which come to all of us in This Modern World, in a can.

You've already seen the Sandwich In A Can™, and Sweet Sue's Whole Chicken In A Can™. Now, we bring you Pancake Essence Beverage by the Japan's Dydo Corporation (a division of Nataka Heavy Machine Industries. Okay, we made that part up).

Join His World-Family-Revolution For Cleanliness, Or Die
(Homer Simpson As 'Mister Sparkle', circa 1994)

Apparently, this is a drink which appears to resemble tea with milk, yet tastes like a stack of pancakes with butter and maple syrup -- hence the idea of an "essence" drink, providing a simulacrum of one kind of experience in the guise of another.

The Japanese also make amazingly lifelike Love Dolls, too... the majority of which resemble pre-teen girls, a sad commentary on the state of the sexual tastes of at least one sector of Japan's male population.

A 'Candy Girl', With The M-Series Body: $10,000 US, Please

They aren't the sort of inflate-o-doll you can buy in the 'secret section' at Wal-Mart, either: While they rely on the same essential concept, these silicone productions cost between $8,000 and $10,000 US. And, no, I'm not posting any other photos of that. This is a family blog, goddamn it.

When you can get one in a can, I'll consider it; but remember, I'm a Dog. My only interest in one of the Candy Girls would be as a chew toy, aber natürlich. Just Sayin'.


Saturday, February 19, 2011

Them That Don't, Shall Lose

God Bless The Child


[Q]uestions of basic economic justice, and war and peace... [have] moved so far right that we have a political discourse which would have been largely unrecognizable a generation ago. The first step toward changing that situation is recognizing it for what it is.
-- Paul Campos, 'Single-Wing Politics', (Via Whiskeyfire)
Lawyers, Guns and Money; February 12, 2011
"Everything's fucked up, and nobody goes to jail," he said. "That's your whole story ... Hell, you don't even have to write the rest of it. Just write that."
-- Matt Tabibi, 'Why Isn't Wall Street In Jail?'
Rolling Stone, March 3, 2011 Issue

The collapse of America's financial structure between 2007 and the present (because it isn't over; did you think it was?) has been the result of unregulated greed and arrogance -- personal, and corporate.

It was allowed by a political structure deeply corrupted by an addiction to power and personal wealth. Their complicity was purchased by the financial industry -- and with relatively minuscule amounts of money, compared with the profits made by corporate banks; financial trading houses; insurance, real estate, construction, and mortgage companies -- all as deeply corrupted and addicted to wealth, acquisition and power as their political hirelings.

However, even though the causes and effects of this disaster are clear, and those responsible can be identified ... the government has chosen not to hold them accountable -- but to reward them, by giving them essentially free loans to protect their businesses. They took the money, did little the government wanted them to do, and have continued behaving very much as before.

But of The Masters Of The Universe who run America's financial empire, no one was indicted, no one has been tried, and no one will go to prison.

Banks Too Big To Fail;
Justice Too Insignificant To Win


Bernard Madoff goes to prison. A trader here and there who breaks the rules about insider information will go to prison. One hundred-plus Physicians and Nurses will be prosecuted for Medicare fraud. But the players who have effectively destabilized the global economy, while making themselves and their friends into multi-Billionaires -- will never be held accountable. They simply continue to become more wealthy, protected, and coddled.

This is the truth: They Got Away With It. It's at variance with public messages of America as a nation of laws, where the rights of all persons except enemies of the State, the disenfranchised, the poor, or those without connections are respected, and where every person and every institution who can afford to purchase justice are equal before those laws.

This is at variance with what most people have been taught as children about the difference between Right and Wrong. It's a breach of commonly-held societal ethics, the cooperative, shared fabric most people inhabit in order to get through their day. It doesn't correlate with the messages in film and teevee and novels: You break the law; you're caught; in some way, you're punished.

That the Masters Of The Universe have not been held accountable is a message to everyone: If the crime is big enough enough, brazen enough, you will face no penalty; and you may be rewarded. Because things aren't fair, and the world really is arranged to favor the strong over the weak, the rich over the poor: I Got Mine, Baby; And Screw Everyone But Me And Thee... And Maybe You, Too.

Sacrifice Your Children To The Jaguar God

America finally realizes it has a massive National Debt -- created primarily by fiscal and foreign policies of the Right since 1981, which lowered corporate taxes, protected the wealthy and (covertly or overtly) waged endless war. If America doesn't reduce that Debt, our economy will implode; so, government spending and national priorities will have to be reallocated.

And, rather than raise taxes, our political class claims the only true way to reduce the Debt is by curtailing or even destroying the social safety nets developed to protect the weakest and most vulnerable of our population. It's as if the monster those same politicians assisted in creating now has to be fed, almost literally, with human sacrifices.

High unemployment, lowered standards of living for the majority of the population; fiscal policies which widen the gulf between the wealthy and everyone else -- these are already becoming the 'New Normal', and if the political Right forces enactment of a New Austerity in the Federal Budget, it will be graven in stone as national policy -- and the Right will claim credit as a 'wise, bipartisan compromise' to end the 'fiscal irresponsibility' of a loony, Socialist Left, whom they allege is running the country.

It won't matter that this is a lie. The wealthiest of our population will continue to be catered to. Likewise, our corporations. Our political class will see to it that the effects of the financial disaster will be paid for by everyone else -- Them that has, Gets; Them that don't, shall Lose. The weak culls will fall by the wayside as nature intended. It's natural law.

The Budget: Which Vision Of Government Wins?

Rightist social Darwinism was the reasoning behind putting Social Security, Unemployment Insurance, and later Medicare and Medicaid, in place. FDR and the Democrats recognized that Capital's Boom-and-Bust business cycles were systemic, and only by creating some minimal, safe harbor could a government ensure that the elderly didn't starve in the streets, and the poor wouldn't die from disease.

And it seemed proper that taxation -- for business, for individuals -- would contribute to a collective solution for a repeating issue: Excess Risk in the business sector, periodically placing the country's economy (and the stability of most of the population) in jeopardy.

Even with the obvious social benefits to the American population, the fight to pass these ideas into law were symbolic of the Right, and Left's, vision of what the national government's relationship with it's people were about.

Social Security, Unemployment, and Medicare-Medicaid were compacts between a national government and its citizens: You, the individual, matter. Your health, welfare and security are your government's first concerns -- and your income, social status, race, religion, gender, or political beliefs are irrelevant. You're all important as human beings and citizens of America; we won't let you suffer. We'll be there to help you.

It's been taught that this philosophy of government is a natural extension of America's uniqueness, that it reflects our all-embracing equality. We've been told this perspective of the national government viz. The People sets our nation apart -- makes us better than Venezuelan Banana Republics, the Russias or Italys run by Oligarchs like private clubs; and the Zimbabwean, African strong-man-style dictatorships. We're Americans; we're better than that.

Government Is For Losers

But for our Owner Class, and the political Right, that's not what government is for. Their worldview favors the individual, not the collective, good. It benefits those who Have, and those who don't are free to show some guts and claw their way up: Nature, Competition; red in tooth and claw, is how the world works -- god's way of winnowing the Elect from the rest of us, who (in the best Puritan, Calvinist tradition) are just bound for hellfire anyway.

The Right's politicians, the Villagers in D.C., America's corporate noveau riche and the old-money wealthy only want the Gravy Train to continue. The wealthy want to live quiet, rich, full lives in secluded splendor, as generations before them have done. They don't care what goes on, outside.

Corporations want the ability to operate their enterprises as they see fit, with any regulation essentially for show: They could care less if the future has the pernicious smell of a Love Canal, the strange, bad taste of Wright County Eggs, or all the safety of a Toyota Camry; it's about Free Enterprise, Baby! They feel their Federal and State taxes are far too high. They want the FDA, FTSB, EPA and SEC off their backs, and they want consumers to pay higher prices. Because.

National government, in the opinion of these people, should return to what it was immediately after 1865 -- unobtrusive, largely unseen. Social programs and restrictive legislation are wasteful. They benefit people whose contributions to the world are minimal at best. And it restricts free enterprise through unfair taxation and science no one cares about; it harms the ability to amass wealth and pass it down intact to one's heirs: It's a family thing.

America, they will tell you, was created by strong individuals with vision, who directed our workers national energies by paying pittance wages and offering no benefits for generations until forced to do so toward a bright future. They've dreamed of killing the "Socialism" of FDR and the New Deal, the Kennedys, and LBJ having the clock rolled back for almost eighty years. Now (and please God, I hope not), they might get their wish.

Remember To Bow As They Pass

If and when the country subsides into a dark cycle of poverty and ignorance for everyone except those who can afford to avoid it, and if their comfort is built on a mountain of suffering, the virtual indentured servitude of others... Does anyone believe they'll care? Do they show that they care now?

The rest of us will have to be satisfied with lower expectations for clean water and air, housing; safe food; good basic education; safe neighborhoods or public places, and medical care beyond aspirins, bandaids and Mercurochrome. And, that the highest aspirations of our children may be to one day rise high enough to serve and personally kiss the asses of The Masters Of The Universe.

Not that all this is any great surprise, you understand.


Friday, February 18, 2011

Them That Has, Gets

Jobless Recovery; Less For You, More For Them
It's A Swell World If You're In The Top 2 Per Cent


As They say, Word.


Thursday, February 17, 2011

Uh-huh

There's bad JuJu in Bahrain; the Governor of Wisconsin is an asshat and has provoked unions in the state to finally stand up and make the Right understand that In Union There Is Strength; all of a sudden, there's greater solar flare activity now than at any time in the past five years; and I seem to gain weight simply by fixing fat right out of the air by breathing.

At The Place Of Witless Labor™, I turned to a Subcreature-Peer and said,
You know what? Whenever you want to deliver bad news about something from now on -- I want you to preface it with, Once upon a time, there was a happy, furry puppy. And I want you to put in a Unicorn, and a rainbow, too. Happy furry puppy, and a rainbow. Then you can share all the deliriously whacked-out crap you want. Just lead with the goddamn furry puppy.

But, all the things I mentioned... they're effectively isolated incidents, right? At the micro level, there's plenty of evidence of sanity, relative stability and a few yucks. Sure there is. And a pony.

Later, jumping on my virtual board and surfing the Intertubes, I found this comment on a someone's website:

Anyway, I'm working on a new post and, despite signs to the contrary, I'm not beginning an agonizing retreat into a life of substance abuse and failure. In fact, just this morning, I ate fruit, drew a picture of my dog and then later waved pleasantly at a person passing by on the street. Is that something that a despondent, irreversibly damaged drunk would do? Kapow. Totally logical and irrefutable rebuttal to your possible doubts.

...all righty then. I'm waiting for the Alien Invasion next. Given the signs, I'm sure it's the next thing coming around the corner.


Stuff Out There

The minute I go outside to chase cars, you let stuff happen.

Humans; leave you alone for a minute, and you despoil the planet, foul the oceans, and treat each other like chattel. So many opportunities to be glad I'm a Dog.

  • Texas = Stupid
    This, which really needs no additional comment, from the New York Times: This month, The Houston Chronicle published an opinion piece by [Barbara Bush, wife of 'Big Boots' Bush] titled “We Can’t Afford to Cut Education,” in which Mrs. Bush pointed out that students in Texas currently rank 47th in the nation in literacy, 49th in verbal SAT scores and 46th in math scores.
  • Texas is also ranks third in the nation in Teen pregnancies (some, even, by non-family members), and Number One in Repregnancies by some of those same Teens! Meanwhile, Governor Rick Perry says Texas is Jus' Fahn; s'All Good.
  • Silvio = Il Più Grande Testicolo L'Europa
    From The Daily Beast: An Italian judge has ordered Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to stand trial for allegedly paying for sex with an underage prostitute and then abusing his official power by trying to cover it up. The judge agreed to waive a preliminary hearing and send Berlusconi directly to trial due to what prosecutors called the “obviousness of the evidence” against him. He faces up to three years in prison on the prostitution charge and 12 years on the abuse of power charge. Silvio, meanwhile, doesn't care, and in a roundtable discussion of the situation with Italian Journalists based in the U.S. on Charlie Rose last night, all agreed this would be a terrific spectacle, but that Berlusconi would not willingly back away from being an Oligarch With A Little Country All His Own. (By the way; I'm not sure how they arrived at the name 'Daily Beast' for their site, but for obvious reasons, I like it.)
  • Continuing Protests Across Middle East
    The NYT notes: "From northern Africa to the Persian Gulf, governments appeared to flounder over just how to outrun mostly peaceful movements, spreading erratically like lava erupting from a volcano, with no predictable end."
  • President, Congress = Slash 'n Burn Crazy Stupid
    Well, you knew this. Unfortunately, we have a leader who has already made a number of bad calls and is about to make another: On the day the Obama administration released its FY 2012 budget... William, a passionate New York Democrat [wrote]: "Yeah, let's cut public health services," he wrote. "Pardon me while I puke. Will this gutless worm fight for anything? He accepts GOP premises and fights on their turf." (From Salon online magazine)
More later. What; this isn't enough?


Friday, February 11, 2011

Fallout

Random Deep Barking

As a Dog, I have a decent enough nose to have understood that the Egyptian army would choose to dump the old guy everyone hated and not shoot innocent people defending that Old Guy, in favor of keeping some control over the changes that will follow after his departure.

My nose tells me now that there will be an Israeli - Palestinian settlement, and possibly a new Palestinian state, before the end of 2011. I'd give it better than 70/30 odds.

And, depending upon which way things fall in Egypt, odds of an airstrike on Iranian nuclear facilities by the Israeli air force (I'd have said 60/40 before Mubarak's departure) are significantly lower now.

Little Mahmood, leader of the Islamic People's Fun Republic Of Chuckles™, must be very pleased. Less so, the Israeli government.

But, I'm only a Dog, and no one listens to me.


Quo Vadis?


What comes next for Egypt? It's easy to say, "That'll be up to the Egyptians", but it isn't entirely accurate.

The United States depended on the stability of Mubarak's regime as a cornerstone of our Middle East policy. They were cool, but still neutral, towards Israel, and Mubarak's secret police and state intelligence apparatus shared information with the CIA (along with interrogating Al-Qaeda prisoners when it suited the U.S.).

That's gone now. What comes next?

The Chess Game

The Iranians, through their client organizations, Hezbollah and Hamas (and others ideologically aligned with them, such as the Islamic Brotherhood in Egypt), would like to extend their influence further, because this is a long story of tribes and religious factions and generations-old rights and wrongs.

At its best, it's just another tale of desire for power over others (always, for their own good), and wealth, of the sort that's despoiled human affairs for twenty Millennia. It's considered the Great Game, played out across thousands of years of history -- and the nations of the West are newcomers ( One reason the English, when they were the dominant Empire, tried so hard to study and understand the East).

These days, it tickles the Iranian Mullahs that Shiite Islamic Persians might begin to rival the Arabic, Sunni Islam regimes (Saudi Arabia in particular; and United Arab Emirates [Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Quataar, Bahrain]; Kuwait), all vastly wealthy from sale of oil reserves, that have led the Muslim world for so long.

It's one reason Iran wants nuclear weapons, why they want control of Lebanon (through Hezbollah and a quiet alliance with Syria); and why they play very nicely with the Taliban and Al-Qaeda: It suits their purposes.

Riding The Tiger

The Muslim Brotherhood has been very quiet during the uprising against Mubarak in Egypt, another Sunni-led nation -- but, then, so were the Bolsheviks in March of 1917.

I'm not trying to equate the Islamics with communists (Little Rupert pays Glenny serious money to do that on teevee). But, that's how it is in revolutions: Radical groups can hijack popular revolts through discipline, organization, and fear. The Bolsheviks did it. In a slightly different way, so did the radical wing of the French Committee For Public Safety during their 1789 Revolution, ending in the execution of the King, and the Terror. So did the English in the revolution against the Stuarts in the seventeenth century, resulting in the execution of the King and the preeminence of Parliament. You could argue that the nazis did followed a similar process, but that would be stretching the example a bit.

Crane Brinton, in Anatomy Of Revolution, a text I once had to read at University, argued that revolutions follow a general pattern: Popular discontent builds until it overflows in demonstrations, strikes, sympathetic politicians walking out of parliament, etc. This is followed by some violent event, a "crisis", that crystallizes the Mob (Brinton's term) and radicalizes them to take action (In France, the storming of the Bastille and the Estates Generale taking control from Louis XVI; in Russia, occupying the Winter Palace and the Duma announcing a new government; the forced abdication of Nicholas II).

The leaders of the Opposition to a regime take control and form a provisional government. At this point, a smaller, more radical group within the Opposition begins to agitate the Mob, causing them to demand more change than the new, more moderate government, is comfortable with.

If they don't make the changes, they'll lose popular support and control of their revolution. As most popular revolts stem from resistance to an oppressive regime, the new government can't arrest the radicals, just because they're asking for change; that's what the revolution was for.

The provisional government is forced to make concessions -- and the radicals, even if they got what they wanted, will claim the provisional government is Wrong And Bad, and go on agitating the Mob, forcing them to make even more concessions or arrest the radicals. It's Morton's Fork -- and, the new government is often well and truly Forked in the end.

Eventually, the radicals make their move, and assume control. Afterward, things can be disorganized and chaotic. People don't like prolonged periods of uncertainty, and not having reliable deliveries of food, and after a time can spark a Thermidorian Reaction (Please look it up. It has nothing to do with lobsters), where a dictator arises (in Britain, Cromwell [though that didn't last]; in France, Napoleon; in Russia, Stalin) to end the revolutionary chaos and provide "order" and "stability". You can see how well that worked out for France, Russia, and for Europe, in Stalin and Napoleon's cases.

The British? Well, look what happened to them: They ran the world for a few hundred years but in their cuisine, boil everything, including their bread (ganz Shreklich); so, who cares.

So, Egypt: Will it evolve into a more free and open Arabic society, a balance of religious belief and secular lifestyles; an example of a middle way out out of despotism and a jewel of the Middle East? Or will it descend into Iranian-style 'Islamic revolution'?

Who knows. As Yoda says, "Always in motion is the future". When in doubt, quote a hand puppet.


Hauling Hosni

Egyptian Army Reportedly In Control

(Screenshot: CNN Live Feed From Egypt As Of 7:00AM PST)

The New York Times online reports:
CAIRO —The Egyptian military appeared to assert its leadership Friday amid growing indications that President Hosni Mubarak was yielding all power. A Western official said that Mr. Mubarak had left the capital, though that could not be independently confirmed. ...

The Associated Press, citing a local official, said that Mr. Mubarak had flown to the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheik, about 250 miles from Cairo, where he maintains a residence.

Angry protesters, who had swarmed by the thousands into the streets here Friday morning, were hardly mollified by the news of Mr. Mubarak’s exit and an accompanying statement by the Supreme Council of the Egyptian Armed Forces over state television and radio indicating that the military, not Mr. Mubarak, was in effective control of the country...

It was unclear whether the military would take meaningful steps toward democracy or embark on a new military dictatorship.

Watching NileTV from Egypt via CNN at the moment; thousands of people standing outside an army cordon, but the soldiers are throwing bags of water or food to some in the crowd, which appears to be in and around the Presidential palace.

NileTV Reporter In The Crowd, Speaking Via Cellphone

A NileTV Reporter is down in the crowd with what appears to be a hand-held radiophone ('walkie-talkie') in one hand, and a Blackberry in the other, talking in one, then the other, back and forth. He's interviewing what appear on occasion to be organizers of the demonstrators, and at other times Guys In The Street, telling the stories or making statements. That sounds normal, to us. In Egypt, it's utterly without precedent.

Try to imagine not being able to express an opinion about your government unless in praise of it. Now, people are standing in the street by the thousands, and can make statements via the national television of a major Arabic nation, saying whatever they want about Mubarak and current events -- and not ending up in jail? Incredible.

(Of course, here, we allow a rainbow of free public discourse -- which means you end up with Evangelicals and White Power crazies and Teabaggers, centrists and Buddhists; Greenpeace, Code Pink and Earth First. So go figure.)

What I'm watching is also being seen in a number of countries in the Arabic world. I imagine the House of Saud must be feeling a little unsettled these days. I can also imagine Osama and his buddies are following this very closely. And Hamas. And Hezbollah. And the Iranians.

And, you can see cell phones being used by demonstrators as they mill around, talking and texting; this is a digital revolution, baby; and it is being televised.

CNN's in-studio translator can't keep up; there is lots of shouting, and people seem to be unhappy (predictably, for a revolution). I'm not getting the sense that the situation is clear for the demonstrators or anyone else.


The protestors are united in their demand that Mubarak leave office and relinquish all control. As it's been reported, this will trigger automatic national elections within 60 days, and a certain amount of chaos.

This is not what the U.S. wants: Our position, as stated by Obama and Secretary Of State Clinton, has been for an "orderly" transfer of power, which was why we were satisfied with Mubarak's announcement that he would step down in September when his term in office was set to expire.

It appears a majority of people in Egypt have, uh, other ideas.


Thursday, February 10, 2011

The Ceauşescu Syndrome

Random Barking: Hosni's Last Stand


On December 22, 1989, the corrupt dictator of Romania, Nicolae Ceauşescu, walked out to a podium and microphones on a balcony of the Central Committee building in Romania's capital, Bucharest, overlooking its main square.

Ceauşescu had run the country's Communist party since the mid 1960's, but the last ten years of his regime was (per Wikipedia) "characterized by an increasingly erratic personality cult, nationalism and a deterioration in foreign relations with the Western powers as well as the Soviet Union."

He infamously enriched himself and various party cronies, constructed gigantic public buildings and statues (to himself) on a Stalinesque scale, while the Romanian people became increasingly impoverished. Like many other Eastern Bloc countries, the Romanian secret police operated at will -- as in Mubarak's Egypt (at least, until January 26th), to criticize or denigrate The corrupt Party, The Leader, or the Leader's wife, Elena (apparently every bit as twisted, avaricious and imperious as her dictator husband), would result in arrest and dispatch to a labor camp.

Nikki And Elena's Simple Home In Bucharest, Capital Of Romania

In April of 1989, the 'Solidarity' party gained a majority in the Polish Parliament, and effectively broke 40-plus years of Communist rule. In August, a crowd of several thousand Hungarians at a 'Pan-European Picnic' rushed across the border into Austria, and were not stopped by armed guards. And in November 1989, after mass protests in East Germany, and a relaxing of border controls between West Germany and Czechoslovakia, tens of thousands of East Berliners flooded into West Berlin. The Wall -- a fixture in the city for twenty-eight years, effectively 'came down': Berlin Bleibt Berlin.

The Wall At The Brandenburger Tor: November 11, 1989

At about the same time, a popular revolt against Ceauşescu's regime had begun in Timisoara, one of Romania's larger cities, and quickly spread throughout the country in a matter of days. Ceauşescu's response was to take personal control of the Romanian government and command of its army.

He ordered it to open fire on unarmed demonstrators in various cities, including Bucharest, in an attempt to control the rebellion -- but all it succeeded in doing was the enrage the opposition, and alienate the army, which had never been given orders to fire on civilians before.

So, when Ceauşescu stepped out on the balcony of the Communist headquarters on that morning in December, there were tens of thousands of people in the square below. It was supposed to have been a staged appearance -- a show of popular support for the old freak -- but the crowd wouldn't allow Ceauşescu to speak, chanting and booing him in huge waves. The army, which was supposed to control the crowd with deadly force if necessary, ignored its orders and stood with the protestors.

As Ceauşescu spoke, groups of protestors rushed the Central Committee building and forced their way inside. Romanian state television's broadcast of the moment shows a panicked state security thug approach Ceauşescu and tell him quickly Boss; we gotta Book, right now:

The aging dictator was taken up to the building's roof -- where a helicopter waited, just in case, to allow a getaway. The crowd cheered, watching him leave Bucharest with his wife. Their intention was to find some place to organize a counterstrike to the revolutionaries (Ceauşescu was deluded enough to believe he still had any support), and they landed near the couple's large 'Summer Estate'. Taking off again, they were forced to land a short time later and taken into local custody in the city of Târgoviște, held prisoner in a local school.

As the video above shows, on December 25, 1989 (Merry Exmass, ya murderous scumbag!), Ceauşescu and his wife were tried by a military tribunal "on charges ranging from illegal gathering of wealth to genocide" (according to Wikipedia). The session was videotaped, and broadcast on Romanian state television later that same day.

Ceauşescu and his wife were found guilty and sentenced to death, taken outside the building where the trial took place and "shot almost as soon as they were placed against a wall" (It happened so quickly that the cameraman wasn't ready to videotape the actual shooting). Apparently, there had been hundreds of volunteers to join the firing squad, just from the local population.

Ironically, capital punishment in Romania was outlawed by its new government almost immediately after Nikki and Elena's execution. A number of western observers have indicated that, if Ceauşescu had simply scarpered off left the country, he might have lived.



In Egypt, Mubarak possibly believes he has done everything to appease the popular uprising calling for his exit. That it hasn't reduced the size of the public protests or their demands that Mubarak step down from power, doesn't appear to have fazed him. Today, he made the smallest of concessions in giving additional power to his newly-appointed Vice President, but he didn't get it: He's still there. And nearly everyone wants him gone.

Today, some ominous signs occurred for Mubarek -- doctors in white lab coats, attorneys in western business suits, joined the protestors in Cairo's Tahir Square who have been camped ther in shifts for two weeks. The head of the government's foreign press bureau was locked out of his own offices by his subordinates. The staff of Egypt's state-controlled main newspaper put out their own edition, siding with the public revolution and demanding Mubarek go.

In cities outside Cairo (principally, Luxor and Alexandra), the size of public demonstrations -- mini-Tahir Squares -- are apparently growing. It's clear this isn't a movement limited to a few square miles in the center of Cairo; it's in the minds and hearts of millions of Egyptians. Freedom's contagious that way.

After Mubarek spoke this evening, the protestors watching a projection of the broadcast on an improvised screen in Tahir Square were stunned, then enraged, by the man's arrogance and hubris; What part of get the hell out don't you understand? There have been calls for a 'Sixteen-million-person march' for tomorrow morning, to center on the Presidential Palace, and the state television headquarters.

This is a turning point in the events that began in late January. The Egyptian army has been a neutral force -- supporting the demonstrators simply by doing nothing, generally keeping the peace. However, they can't permit civil disorder on the scale of a mass of protestors seizing control of the Palace or the State Teevee.

If the army uses force, and protestors are killed or injured, the army is Done. They will be identified in the mind of the Protestors In The Street as supporting the Mubarek regime. And since Hosni is showing no intention to relinquish power, the longer this standoff continues, the greater the possibility of more radical action. And the only people who would truly benefit from that are Islamic extremists.

And, where is our government's position in all this? We've taken a cautious (some feel, too cautious) stand viz. Mubarak's grim clinging to power. At the same time, we can't tell him, or any Egyptian, what to do. Still, it isn't an impossibility that Obama could call Hosni and say, Mr. President, we urge you to fully step down.

I'd say that if the Egyptian army's assessment is that massive public demonstrations tomorrow may turn into a faceoff between them and a popular uprising -- then, between now and tomorrow morning, they may confront Mubarak and force him to step down.

Egypt's army is generally well-regarded; it's been the source of stability and government for fifty years. While it represents dictatorship, emergency decrees and strong-man rule, people also remember that it was their army in the 1950's which removed a corrupt, foreign-dominated playboy king, making a leader of the coup, Colonel Gamal Abdul Nasser, Egypt's first President. The Egyptians acquitted themselves well against the vaunted Israeli army during the 1973 war (where Mubarak was an air force commander and fighter pilot).

When Nasser died, another army general, Anwar Sadat, ascended to the Presidency -- and was later assassinated by Islamic radicals because he had signed a peace treaty with Israel. Sadat was succeeded by Mubarak, becoming Egypt's dictator in fact and using the circumstances of Sadat's death as an excuse for a State of Emergency that has lasted 30 years.

The army still has has credibility to act as a unifying force, an 'honest broker' in a transition from dictatorship to real democracy, only so long as it is perceived as neutral. If, by refusing to step down, Mubarak forces them to prevent public buildings from being seized and shoot unarmed demonstrators in the process, then it stands to lose a great deal.

We'll see what happens. I hope, for everyone's sake, that Mubarak simply understands he's Done, and leaves. But I doubt it. I see too much of Ceauşescu in this situation, and no matter what I hope for, it may not end well.