Saturday, March 31, 2012

Yep; We're Boned. Any Questions?

More Enlightened Self-Interest


Some men see things as they are and ask, "Why?"
I see the same stuff and say, "Yeah, yeah; whatever:

Bender Bender Bender / Bender Bender Bender...

-- Bender

Viva Cut-Rate Europa

The march of Austerity continues in The Europa, as the rightist government in Spain announced a new budget -- one day after an estimated one million people across the country protested against exactly such an event.
"We are taking extraordinary measures because the situation is extraordinary," the budget minister, Cristóbal Montoro, said before announcing €27bn (£22.5bn) in spending cuts and tax rises.

Markets and fellow eurozone members increasingly fear that Spain – whose economy is twice the size of that of Greece, Ireland and Portugal put together – could be the biggest threat to their future.

"Spain is going to stop being a problem, especially for the Spanish people, but also for the European Union," finance minister Luis de Guindos said as he prepared to explain the austerity measures to concerned eurozone ministers who were meeting in Copenhagen.
How is "Spain is going to stop being a problem, especially for the Spanish people", when its government is forcing everyone who isn't already rich to lower their standards of living? Ah... Excuse me? "Spain is going to stop being a problem, especially for the Spanish people". What exactly the fuck does that mean?

And isn't this really one of the central questions about the global economic crisis: Why are the people and institutions not responsible for it being made to pay to "fix" it, while financial institutions, which are responsible, and the wealthy are not made to pay to fix it??
[Montoro] insisted that, with Spanish unemployment at 23% and climbing, he had tried to avoid hurting the economy's chances of recovery. But economists have warned the deficit-cutting measures ... will take two percentage points of GDP off growth, pushing the country into the second part of a double-dip recession.
Yet, for Little Angela and Nicky, and Davey "Friend Of News Corp" Cameron, and so many other EU politicians, the only way to stop the pain of Europe's people is to beat them more savagely.
[Spanish c]ivil servants, whose salaries were cut by 5% in 2010, were among the biggest losers: Their wages were frozen again this year.
MEHR: ... and The Paper of Record tells us:
Europe’s long-running euro crisis may be cooling. But the economic distress ... is pushing a rising tide of workers into precarious straits in France and across the European Union. Today, hundreds of thousands of people are living in campgrounds, vehicles and cheap hotel rooms. Millions more are sharing space with relatives, unable to afford the basic costs of living... a growing slice of the population that is slipping through Europe’s long-vaunted social safety net... trapped in low-paying or temporary jobs that are replacing permanent ones destroyed in Europe’s economic downturn.

Now, economists, European officials and social watchdog groups are warning that the situation is set to worsen. As European governments respond to the crisis by pushing for deep spending cuts to close budget gaps and greater flexibility in their work forces, “the population of working poor will explode,” said Jean-Paul Fitoussi, an economics professor at L’Institut d’Études Politiques in Paris...
Any questions?


Get Ready

Watching the presentation of the Administration's defense of the Affordable Care Act (dubbed "Obamacare" by the Thugs) this past week, many legal reporters made the observation, one way or another, that the Act was already history -- it's all over but the celebratory Texas duck hunt of "Fat Tony" Scalia and 'Dick' Cheney, whose new heart is allegedly as black as his old one.

The arguments all seemed to center around how much the ACA would be declared unconstitutional -- in toto, or just the individual mandate. Which would, if thrown out, effectively gut the Act anyway.

And, the Supreme Court is packed, 5-4, with right-wing morons.

On that glorious day, when persons who have no idea what it's like to live in Everyday America hand down their decision, we can expect to hear about 'blistering retorts' in the Minority Opinions, but so what?

Only incidentally is this about constitutional interpretation or legal scholarship. It's a crowning moment of glory, a time of triumph for the Right, because they can sabotage or steal something from an unassailable position -- as in Bush v. Gore -- because kicking the ACA to the curb will be one more step down the road towards completely reversing the social safety nets of Roosevelt's New Deal.

Fat Tony, in his typically repugnant and didactic manner, will probably write the Majority Opinion and take yet another opportunity to lecture America about Things, since he considers the rest of humanity to wallow far below his towering intellect.

It will be Tony's, and Clarence's, opportunity to bellow Va Fan Kulo to America. It will be the chance for Roberts, Alito, and Kennedy to join them in saying The Law Is Made By Those With The Power To Do So, and as Tubby Tony scrapes his fingers beneath his chin at us, crows We Win, Liberals; So Fuck You. I'll be happy to be proven wrong, but don't think it's in the cards.

Unfortunately for everyone else, that kind of ideologically-driven decision will end up tarnishing even further the legitimacy of the structure of law in the minds of ordinary American citizens -- after Bush v. Gore, and then Citizens United, people understood that Money Talks, and that principle is now openly enshrined into law. With every decision that favors the few with money and influence, the spirit of the Constitution and the people who crafted and debated it -- the same Framers which people like Fat Tony hotly claim to emulate -- is diminished.

We like to believe Justice cannot be purchased. We like to claim that the principle underlying America's 'Big-D' Democracy is the rule of law -- impartial, fair; applying equally to all, regardless of our position in society or on an economic scale. And every decision made by an ideologically skewed, partisan Supreme Court, turning our beliefs in the Law on its head, gives another piece of our birthright away.

But, so what? The Scalia Court doesn't really care what you think. Get back to work and keep your whining mouths shut, and remember to take your caps off when Your Betters speak to you.

MEHR: The New York Times reports this morning:
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that officials may strip-search people arrested for any offense, however minor, before admitting them to jails even if the officials have no reason to suspect the presence of contraband.

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, joined by the court’s conservative wing, wrote that courts are in no position to second-guess the judgments of correctional officials...

Justice Stephen G. Breyer, writing for the four dissenters, said strip-searches were “a serious affront to human dignity and to individual privacy” and should be used only when there was good reason to do so.
Things look bad enough without having to look closer at 'em.
-- Bender

Any questions?


Countdown To Super Special Fun Continues

One dog's opinion, but I still have the feeling Iran will be hit by Israeli airstrikes in the next six to eight weeks. And after that, things will be All Different.

In addition to everything else that's happened so far, the state of Azerbaijan has granted Israel access to several of its airports. They're only of use for launching strikes on Iranian targets.

Further UN-sponsored talks are scheduled with the Iranian government about it's nuclear development on April 23rd. As the UN says, the Iranians have used sessions like this to do nothing but delay, obfuscate, and buy more time.

It's certainly possible that the airport arrangements are long-term, forward-looking -- or, that Israel's obtaining rights to use them is one more indication to the Iranian Mullahs and Revolutionary Guard how serious the Israelis are; as if anyone had to tell them. But perhaps someone does. Azerbaijan is generally upwind of any potential Iranian targets that involve its nuclear industry.

And, part of the contingency planning for any operation is weather. The dark-of-the-moon period over the next eight weeks is April 21 to 23, and May 19 to 21, with north to northwesterly winds. The United States has or will have the majority of our aircraft carriers in the vicinity of the Persian Gulf during these times.

Not that this means anything; there's a tremendous amount of feinting and saber-rattling going on via leaks in national press and military assets moving around the Gulf. Think about the events we can't see, of cabinets and advisors talking with heads of state, of military planners going over operational orders, diplomats and intelligence types having hushed conversations in out-of-the-way places.

They're trying to avert disaster, ensure the security of their nations, or prepare for what some of them see as inevitable. In the end, the most visible parts of all this -- ships and armed men facing off against each other -- is the more important, because this is about brinksmanship. Diplomacy may represent reason, but at base the Iranians and Israelis want their opposites to blink... and that means getting closer and closer to the Fabled Edge; which isn't about reason, but fear and rage and pride.

In any event, if airstrikes occur, we (that is, us; the American Guy and Gal in the Street) won't like what comes afterwards. Some people may be strongly tempted to protest if America gets involved, which we likely would be compelled to. Russia and China also have an interest in anything that happens to Iran, since it will literally take place on their doorsteps -- and while we might be able to deal with the Russians (the Mittster's recent comments aside) frankly, the Chinese don't like us that much anyway.

Well... it will be interesting, as any slow-motion train wreck is; you can't look away. Deeply saddening, it is already.


Any questions?


MITT!!!

The Rethug primaries continue. They're the equivalent to that episode of Futurama ("Mobius Dick"; Season 6), where the Good Ship Planet Express goes into the Bermuda Tetrahedron, braving the Tickle-Me-Elmo's Fire, and on into a wormhole after a giant, off-white, Killer Space Whale.

Inside the black hole, time runs sideways; Fry says "Poop!" forever, and America is treated to an uncountably infinite number of rude-talking robots in a circular Conga line, singing Bender Bender Bender / Bender Bender Bender... (Which finally explains that ham-and-cheese version of the RFK quote at the top of this post.)

Well, watching the GOP Race To The Bottom™ is pretty much like that, but the writing isn't as good. It has a majority of the Republican Party slowing transforming into Mittwissers (sic; sorry, folks; and for you Deutsch-Englisch bilingual types -- I couldn't resist).

Little Ricky has tried valiantly to turn Rethugs everywhere into the Party Of No Sexytime and Prayer For All, and Ron Paul tells reporters to shut up when asked why he's bothering to appear and talk about UN black helicopters and why Vince Foster didn't know enough and so had to die. Or some damn thing or other. (I'd like to hear more about the giant, UN-trained radioactive scorpion in his basement.)

Meanwhile, Randyman is somewhere being tubby, but no one cares. So long as nothing happens (like bombing Iran, for example) to deep-six the so-called recovery -- which will eventually be deep-sixed by the Attack Of The Giant European Austerity -- President Obama will probably be re-elected in time to bail out Goldman-Saks-Squid a third time.

Or, not. Cynicism is running high in this country. It's an open question whether it matters that The Mittster, Obama, or A Large Rock is elected to the Presidency in November. And in that cynicism is a distrust of a central, Federal government, an apathetic resignation to living in a Russian-style 'Republic' dominated by Oligarchs and corporate power.

And, I suppose enough people haven't yet realized that this distrust and apathy is exactly what the Rethugs want the ordinary citizen to feel.

"Yep; we're boned!" And that's 30 for this edition.

Any questions?


Friday, March 30, 2012

Fünf Schwein Ruft Mich An

If I See One More Picture Of 'Fat Tony' Scalia, I'll Throw Up In A Bucket

We're in amazingly deep water, now; it's getting hotter -- and all the frogs around us keep looking at each other, exchanging glances (Hey, if this gets much hotter, we're cooked). Balloon Juice:
Burn Down The Mission
By DougJ, Head of Infidelity
March 29th, 2012

If SCOTUS voids the ACA, (I agree with John that they’re reasonably like to) there’s going to be a lot of talk about how liberals need to moderate their attacks on the court for the sake of the sanctity of our institutions, how even the liberal Joe Nocera and Kevin Drum agree that all the problems started when Bork was Borked and so on.

Fuck that.

If Republican judges void ACA, liberals need to launch an all-out assault all the credibility of the Roberts courts (I have to think more about this). It can’t always be liberals need to bend over and take it to keep our society from unraveling. It already is unraveling anyway.
And, John Cole notes (paragraphing added for emphasis):
News flash: Right wing hacks tend to act like right wing hacks. We’re talking about a conservative bloc [on the SCOTUS] whose wives openly work for tea party groups, we’re talking about hacks that speak privately to the tea party. We’re talking about people who lie on their disclosure forms for decades to cover up the money their wives are receiving from wingnut welfare organizations.

Every one of these men was a member of the Federalist Society. Every single one of them was groomed for exactly what they are doing right now. This is their time to shine, to do what they have been groomed to do.

When you train soldiers to fight, and drill their mission into them every day, and drill the rightness and correctness of their mission into them every day, and assure them they are fighting for truth, justice, and the American way, only a fool would be surprised that they are eager to go into combat.
And, over at The Great Curmudgeon, a guest poster reminds us that we've been here before:
Precedent

Bush v Gore.

by Jay Ackroyd at 00:53
168 Comments
Any questions?


Tuesday, March 27, 2012

What Day Is To-day?

It's Marilyn's Birth-Day

What a day for a birthday! Let's all have some cake!

And you smell like one too! YAAAAAAY!

Happy Birthday Marilyn O'Malley.


Friday, March 23, 2012

Reprint Heaven: Youth Conservatives Rage Against The Machine

(Originally Thrown At You On July 2, 2010)

Elena Kagan; First Day Of Confirmation Hearings (Photo: AP)

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- At the U.S. Capitol yesterday, some fifty self-described D.C. "youth conservatives" protested against the nomination of Elena Kagan to the United States Supreme Court.

"We're, like, just very upset that this kind of person is, like, going to be on the Supreme Court?" said Britney Hollingsworth, 20, a student at Georgetown University and president of its local chapter of Campus Young Republicans. "I mean, oh-kay; Hell-o?? I mean just, like, you know, look at this person. She's just won't do, at all."

Some Of Fifty Young Conservatives, At The Capitol
(Original Photo: Evan McMorris-Santoro, TPM)

"Most of these, uh, kind of people, you know?" added Caroline Wilksberry, a 19-year-old Freshman at Brown University, "They just don't represent us, you know, mainstream Americans? I had my driver bring me down here today, you know? Because I saw her [Kagan] on television and just thought, you know, 'Ugh'. I mean, she's so tacky. Plus, she's part of a liberal conspiracy to make us all, just-- " Wilksberry waved one hand in the air -- "like, peasants!"

"Rully, rully true," Hollingsworth said. "I mean, I don't want this Kagan person on my Supreme Court. Let's just, you know, like -- put it right out there, you know? Let's just 'speak truth to power', okay? She's, like, not like Chief Justice Roberts, or Justice Kennedy, or even Justice Scalia or Justice Alito. I mean, they're Catholics and all, but they're on the right side. Kagan's just not, you know, 'batting for the team'."

Britney And Caroline At George Will's House In Georgetown
For The Protest After-Party (Photo: YoureNotOurCrowd.kom)

"Not the actual girls' team, added Wilkesberry.

Were the protesters implying that Kagan was homosexual? "Oh, dear; I wouldn't know about that," Hollingsworth responded. "I think Carrie -- and don't let me, like, put words in your mouth, or anything -- what she means is that Kagan's, like, you know -- like, 'not mainstream'."

Then, were they commenting on the fact that Kagan, 50, is Jewish? Both young women responded in the negative. "That's just so unfair, you know? What an awful question," Hollingsworth said. "We, like, have tons of Jewish friends and stuff. My father's accountant is Jewish; I mean, they're like, fine, okay? I've even been to that thing they have at Easter, which isn't Easter. I was in Tel Aviv -- okay, just to change planes; but, I mean, still."

"Me too," added Wilksberry. "I've changed planes there."

"Was that when you and Kiki went to Davos?" Hollingsworth asked.

Other Youth Conservatives Relax In New York City

"No, that was that 'Spring Arab Thing'," Wilksberry responded with a giggle. "Anyway -- we just think Kagan is a tacky socalist. They need a lot more spa days -- and Kagan could stand some exercise -- 'Boot camp for you, girl!' And she was the legal-something for Harvard; I know, but it wasn't like she went there, but because they hired her, okay? Hell-o? And she denied the military to do its constitutional duty to serve and protect, you know; or whatever that scandal was that she did. Plus -- oh! oh! Here's something --"

"I so totally know what you're gonna say!" Hollingsworth added.

"Totally," Wilksberry said. "Okay. Okay -- I know, okay; I know a guy at Yale whose family's groundskeeper was, like, some Communist? Or who went to some twelve-step program they have for Communism, or something? And he told this guy I know that he had seen Kagan in, like, Nicaragua or Cuba or someplace, in 1970!!" Wilksberry paused, smiling. "I mean, there you are!"

"They should, like, be asking her about that in there," Hollingsworth said, pointing in the general direction of the Capitol.

Steven Prescott Kingsford III, Near The National Mall

When it was pointed out that Kagan would have been nine years old in 1970, the two women, and a number of other Youth Conservatives in earshot, gave hoots of derision.

"Hoot! Hoot! That's the liberal media for you," said Steven Prescott Kingsford III, a Sophomore at Princeton. "If you do an analysis of every legal interpretation Kagan has ever made, you can see she quotes radical extremists and Communists. And if things go much further this way in America, I guess we'll just have to hire a bunch of these fundamentalists to run things for a while and get people like Kagan off our backs."

"Hoot!" added Edward Biddle Barrows, who accompanied Kingsford from Princeton, where both are on the university's Lacrosse team. "The ladies here," Barrows said, gesturing at Hollingsworth and Wilksberry, "Are perhaps too polite to say; but, Kagan just doesn't measure up to service on the high court. Not in any way."

Barrows, And Friends, In George Will's Basement At The
Protest After-Party: Lacrosse High Five (Photo: A Blog)

"It's like promoting your cook to become your business manager," Hollingsworth said. "Not that such people like that can't, you know -- whip up one hell of a meal on short notice. But to do an investment analysis, or make a decision involving, like, you know -- big stuff? Well, they're just not up to it." Flipping her blonde hair fetchingly, Hollingsworth smiled. "Kagan should just realize her limitations."

"When you have to hire persons," Kingsford added, "they have to be adequately trained; have some seasoning. They have to be -- the right sort. Kagan isn't; not trained, not seasoned, and not right."

"That is so right on," Wilkesberry said. "I'm not going to stand by and watch the interests of people who matter in this country be compromised by a woman who dresses like a Sunday school teacher in Bar Harbor."

"Decide Between Buying 200,000 Forested Acres In Western
Canada, And Investing In Bonds? Above Her Pay Grade!"

"Sweetie, she couldn't teach Sunday school," Holligsworth responded, and the party of Youth Conservatives laughed before going off, as they noted, "for cocktails". A protest after-party was held at George Will's Georgetown home, where the Youth mingled with the likes of Will, Red State's Erik Erikson, newly-married Megan McArdle (trailed by son, Megalon, and his wranglers), and a special-surprise guest appearance by Charles Krauthammer's hair colorist.

Kagan completed her questioning by Senators as to her qualifications for a position in helping to shape the legal basis for American society. Red State later claimed Kagan had been seen buying a book on Marxist political theory in the "Gay and Lesbian" interest section of a local McBorders.

In fairness, it should be pointed out that Red State also believes Jonah Goldberg's tome, Liberal Fascism, is as important a book as Rand's The Fountainhead, or the two metric tons of Ezra Pound's unpublished anti-Semitic writings.


Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Random Barking

Arthur Miller
To my mind the essential difference, and the precise difference, between tragedy and pathos is that tragedy brings us not only sadness, sympathy, identification and even fear; it also, unlike pathos, brings us knowledge or enlightenment.

As Aristotle said, the poet is greater than the historian because he presents not only things as they were, but foreshadows what they might have been. We forsake literature when we are content to chronicle disaster. Tragedy, therefore, is inseparable from a certain modest hope regarding the human animal. And it is the glimpse of this brighter possibility that raises sadness out of the pathetic toward the tragic...

The possibility of victory must be there in tragedy. Where pathos rules, where pathos is finally derived, a character has fought a battle he could not possibly have won. The pathetic is achieved when the protagonist is, by virtue of his witlessness, his insensitivity or the very air he gives off, incapable of grappling with a much superior force.

Pathos truly is the mode for the pessimist. But tragedy requires a nicer balance between what is possible and what is impossible.
-- From “The Tragedy of the Common Man”, and “The Name of Tragedy”; New York Herald-Tribune, 1949


Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Think Of The Lobster

And They Are Where?

So I'm sitting around, waiting for The Girl to call, and already know the answer to the "Are we going to war with Iran?" question (Why? Because Your Elders 'n Betters are in fact that stupid, that's why), and the "Why does Lard Boy Hate Wimmins?" query (Man, that one's easy).

That's all bye the bye, boyo. What bothers me is: Where is Giblets? Where is Fafnir? What about the grilled cheese sandwich?

What About The Medium Lobster????

Just Sayin'.


Monday, March 5, 2012

Talk Amongst Yourselves

Go Ahead. We Trust You.

As I said a while ago, I'm not entirely sure about continuing to blog.

If this was the principal focus of my day, I'd be happy to opine on all manner of Stuff™. If I were both educated in depth, and employed in, a field that deals with many of the subjects I like to talk about, it's possible I'd be offering original ideas that might have a positive outcome for actual people.

But I do have a job, and a life, and if I spend time here, I don't want to just make wisecracks while passing along the wisdom of others, prophets spraypainting wisdom on their own subway walls. It's not very original, and not very satisfying.

I do like keeping tabs on what's happening. I like having an opinion about things, and putting it out there (It's something the Intertubes is famous for; talk about Democracy -- you can tell people you speak for the High Thetan Council Of the Magellan Cluster, or post your mother's favorite recipes, with equal abandon). I enjoy looking at situations, and can make an educated guess about what may happen based on nothing but what I know, everything I read, and on whatever currents in the culture or world events I smell with my Dog's Nose.

But all that is an illusion -- the idea that making pronouncements about the State Of Things is any better than reading tea leaves... and in that sense I'm no less equipped to prognosticate than a majority of the paid "policy analysts", bombasticating from their Institutes in and around the Beltway. The difference between them and myself is, they believe they can shape reality with their opinions, and are paid handsomely to do so; I know that the world is too slippery a place for anyone to say what will happen, and when. We can't even agree that facts are actually facts any longer, and that spells trouble.

It is a fact that we, in America and elsewhere, have been screwed while still wearing our pants for a long time; and the game is so rigged in favor of a tiny segment of the population that the immensity of it is barely comprehensible. We can see the world in motion, right in front of us, rising and falling in new patterns like a fantastic kaleidoscope every hour of the day. I have opinions about all of it, but they are just opinions, and they are only mine.

I joke that three people and a superintelligent parakeet are the only ones who actually read Before Nine, but in truth I never started doing this for any other reason than to have a bit o' fun. It certainly wasn't about popularity or money.

While I care about politics and economics, I'm neither an economist, financial analyst or political organizer. There are, however, other things I care about -- it's what the masthead says: One Person's Art and Literature. So perhaps this Blog will continue, but if so its focus is likely to change. We'll see.

It probably will, because some people do read it. After all -- you don't want a superintelligent parakeet pissed off at you. You don't. Trust me.


Thursday, March 1, 2012

There's A Reason For That

Apparently, We Need To Be Reminded

Barry Ritholtz, at his The Big Picture, recently weighed in on events -- which he's both witnessed and reported on -- that have been happening in the banking and financial sector since the turn of this century... MFGlobal being the most recent and obvious example.

It's a Back To First Principles moment, and I love it when he does this. It's like a scene in a Frank Capra film: In a room full of people, babbling about events that have just occurred, a lone character stands up on a chair and delivers a three-minute speech, telling everyone the Truth -- exactly what's happened and why. No equivocation, no hyperbole, and clear as a bell.

And watching this, most everyone in the scene (as well as the theatre) says, "Hey -- she's right! This Bullshit is fucked up an' shit!!"

(All right; save it -- and yes; I borrowed that tart little phrase from The Great Curmudegon. But the people in the theatre are thinking something like that.)
This will be a short but simple post, to clarify some fundamental misunderstandings about the purposes of laws, regulations, and codes of conduct in society.

Laws do not prevent crimes. We can legislate all the criminal laws we want, but there will still be bank robberies and drunk driving and murders. We pass laws not to prevent these acts from taking place, but rather, to make sure there is a very high cost to committing them.

In fact, we legislate criminal laws for three broad reasons:

1. Let people know exactly what is acceptable and unacceptable behavior.
2. Punish people who violate these norms.
3. Remove the dangerous people from society for the protection of everyone else.

We create corporate regulations in order to effect similar broad policy purposes:

1. Inform companies what is unacceptable economic behavior.
2. Punish corporate management who violate these norms.
3. Remove dangerous economic behaviors from society.

By economic behaviors, I refer to any impact a company has in the broader economy...

When it comes to laws, there is always a trade off: My freedom ends where your nose begins... Anything a corporation does that threatens these same things is fair game for regulation.

There is a nefarious group of corporate cronies who abuse the word “Freedom.” They employ the word to mean curtailing everyone else’s freedom. They seem to believe Freedom is a license to behave recklessly, to endanger third parties, to risk the economy.

It is not.

The sooner we recognize these simple truths, the faster this society will be heading in the right direction. I suspect that the longer we delay recognizing these truths, the slower our economic recovery will be.


Making Little Rupert's Faux Daughter Happy

Scotland Yard Gave Rebecca Brooks A Pony

Remember Rebecca Brooks, the nasty, lying, opportunistic sociopath former head of Little Rupert's British organization, who appeared to be hand-picked by The Crafty Ol' Digger himself for greater things? Until she resigned in disgrace, and was immediately arrested on charges arising from what's become the largest case of a single industry corrupting the police agencies of an entire country?

Proving that there's nothing Merry Olde England's Right-wing politicians won't do to get into bed with a Joey Goebbels Wannabe, it appears -- among the many perks 'n treats provided to Little Rupert's News Corp -- that Scotland Yard, that venerable Olde English institution, provided Lil' Becka with her own police horse.
A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police pointed out that it is routine for retired Mounted Branch horses to be lent out to members of the public at the end of their working lives, but the arrangement is likely to raise fresh questions about the Met's relationship with Mrs Brooks.

The news comes a day after the Leveson Inquiry was told that Mrs Brooks was briefed by a senior Met officer on the progress of the original phone-hacking inquiry and even consulted on how far she thought the investigation should go.
Little Rupert's comment, true 'fuck'em' Aussie fashion, was to observe that Lil' Becka "saved" the horse from the "glue factory".

As the writer Antole France once observed with irony: The law, in all its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges."

So we should simply pass laws which allow people like 'Becka, Little Rupert and his Issue, Jimmy The Fish, to do whatever they want without fear of prosecution. They can bribe cops, tap phones, steal, and whatever else comes into their little minds. Absolutely anything.

Why not? They're going to do it anyway. We may as well acknowledge what we can see with our own lying eyes, and as reported in the few journalistic organs Rupert doesn't own; and just get it over with.

And Little Rupert's "news" organs can trumpet the good news: The Rich win. Yay !


Andrew Breitbart Dead

And A Nation Mourns


Screenshot From The "Goof Gas Attack" Episode Of
Rocky and His Friends, 1962 (Wikipedia)

However, the nation in mourning is Pottslyvania. Told of Breitbart's death, Fearless Leader said, "Who?"

I won't be making any (other) cheap jokes at Herr Breitbart's expense. I never knew the man -- he was (as Commander Worf pointed out from time to time on STNG) "Not of my home world".



Life isn't only only about showing up; what you do while you're here, and how you affect others, matters. And if you demanded more attention from the world in life than most people -- your actions affect so many more.

Here are Breitbart's Tweets following announcement of Senator Ted Kennedy's death:
@AndrewBreitbart
AndrewBreitbart
26 Aug 09 via web


-- Rest In Chappaquiddick

-- Kennedy is my villain. He took me
from left to right during the [Clarence]
Thomas hearings. Really. Then read Joe
McGuiness book & I wanted to puke.

-- he was a f@#$er. a big ass motherf@#$er.
this aint a 24-hour zone, baby. he was a bad,
bad dude. & if mary jo were your kin youd
be dancin'.

-- This duplicitous bastard spit on GWB's face
when he reached across party lines. T was a
grade school trick. Even til the end, he was a prick.

-- I'll shut my mouth for Carter. That's just
politics. Kennedy was a special pile of human
excrement.
When another conservative replied, asking him not to treat Kennedy like they believe some on the left treated the passing of Tony Snow and Ronald Reagan, Breitbart responded:
-- @AblativMeatshld How dare you compare Snow
& Reagan to Kennedy! Why do you grant a BULLY
special status upon his death? This isnt lib v con.

-- Look, this man was granted absolution for nothing.
Class, life station played a part but PARTY was every-
thing. GOP couldnt get away with it.

-- In this moment I cant but recognize absolute back-
wardness of media & society. Bush=EVIL. Ted Kennedy=SAINT.
Im gonna keep fighin', folks.
This is an example of one man's actions, and in comparison I don't want to celebrate another person's death by heaping my own vitriol on them. I know about the effect of individual deaths on the people who love them (and yes; even this man had them). That needs to be recognized.

However, the lessening of negativity and the spewing of falsehoods and hatred into our national discourse in the wake of one man's death is not a cause for sorrow. I mourn the man; but I am grateful for waking into a world with that much less unnecessary divisive anger.

I didn't like what Breitbart did, and didn't like his 'contribution' to our culture. But, from wherever he is, now he knows what we do not.
The players you have seen; whether their acts were bad or good; whether they were rouges or heroes; They Are All Equal Now.